首页> 外文期刊>Journal of symbolic computation >Comparison of theoretical complexities of two methods for computing annihilating ideals of polynomials
【24h】

Comparison of theoretical complexities of two methods for computing annihilating ideals of polynomials

机译:两种计算an灭理想的方法的理论复杂性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Let f_1,..., f_p be polynomials in C[x_1,..., x_n] and let D = D_n be the n-th Weyl algebra. We provide upper bounds for the complexity of computing the annihilating ideal of f~s = f~(s_1)_1...f~(s_p)_p in D[s] = D[s_1, ..., s_p]. These bounds provide an initial explanation of the differences between the running times of the two methods known to obtain the so-called Bernstein-Sato ideals.
机译:令f_1,...,f_p为C [x_1,...,x_n]中的多项式,令D = D_n为第n个Weyl代数。我们提供了在D [s] = D [s_1,...,s_p]中计算f〜s = f〜(s_1)_1 ... f〜(s_p)_p的an灭理想的复杂性的上限。这些界限初步解释了两种已知的获得所谓的伯恩斯坦-萨托理想的方法的运行时间之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号