首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Tourism >Local tourism governance: a comparison of three network approaches
【24h】

Local tourism governance: a comparison of three network approaches

机译:地方旅游治理:三种网络方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is an absence of knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of different local tourism governance approaches. Consequently, experimenting with different modes of local tourism governance is increasingly common. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the ways in which three different local tourism governance networks operate, and the effects of this governance on local tourism policy. The three local tourism networks examined are a council-led network governance structure, a participant-led community network governance structure and a local tourism organisation (LTO)-led industry network governance structure. The study found that these governance arrangements were underpinned by four key trade-offs and that these tended to shape the effectiveness of local tourism governance. The significance of this paper is that it opens up discussion about local tourism governance, highlights the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches and reflects on their relevance to sustainable tourism management. The findings can inform local councils interested in improving their local organisation of tourism, and spur further research.
机译:尚不了解不同的当地旅游业治理方法的优缺点。因此,尝试使用不同模式的当地旅游业治理越来越普遍。本文通过研究三种不同的当地旅游业治理网络的运作方式以及这种治理对当地旅游政策的影响,解决了这一知识鸿沟。考察的三个本地旅游网络是理事会主导的网络治理结构,参与者主导的社区网络治理结构和本地旅游组织(LTO)主导的行业网络治理结构。研究发现,这些治理安排以四个关键的权衡为基础,并且这些权衡往往会影响当地旅游业治理的有效性。本文的意义在于,它开启了有关地方旅游业治理的讨论,强调了不同方法的优缺点,并反思了它们与可持续旅游业管理的相关性。这些发现可以为有兴趣改善当地旅游组织的地方理事会提供信息,并推动进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号