首页> 外文期刊>Journal of structural geology >Uncertainty in strain-rate from field measurements of the geometry, rates and kinematics of active normal faults: Implications for seismic hazard assessment
【24h】

Uncertainty in strain-rate from field measurements of the geometry, rates and kinematics of active normal faults: Implications for seismic hazard assessment

机译:现场测量活动正断层的几何形状,速率和运动学得出的应变率不确定性:对地震危险性评估的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Multiple measurements of the geometry, kinematics and rates of slip across the Auletta fault (Campania, Italy) are presented, and we use these to determine: (1) the spatial resolution of field measurements needed to accurately calculate a representative strain-rate; (2) what aspects of the geometry and kinematics would introduce uncertainty with regard to the strain-rate if not measured in the field. We find that the magnitude of the post last-glacial maximum throw across the fault varies along strike. If such variations are unnoticed, different values for a representative strain-rate, hence different results in seismic hazard calculations, would be produced. To demonstrate this, we progressively degrade our dataset, calculating the implied strain-rate at each step. Excluding measurements can alter strain-rate results beyond 1 sigma uncertainty, thus we urge caution when using only one measurement of slip-rate for calculating hazard. We investigate the effect of approximating the throw profile along the fault with boxcar and triangular distributions and show that this can underestimate or overestimate the strain-rate, with results in the range of 72-237% of our most detailed strain-rate calculation. We discuss how improved understanding of the potential implied errors in strain-rate calculations from field structural data should be implemented in seismic hazard calculations.
机译:提出了对横跨Auletta断层(意大利坎帕尼亚)的几何学,运动学和滑移率的多次测量,我们用它们来确定:(1)精确测量代表性应变率所需的现场测量的空间分辨率; (2)如果不在现场进行测量,则几何学和运动学的哪些方面会引起应变率的不确定性。我们发现,断层末次冰期后最大投掷的幅度随走向而变化。如果不注意这种变化,将产生代表应变率的不同值,从而在地震危险计算中产生不同的结果。为了证明这一点,我们逐步降低我们的数据集,在每个步骤中计算隐含的应变率。排除测量值可能会使应变率结果的变化超出1 sigma的不确定性,因此,当仅使用滑移率的一种测量结果来计算危险时,我们强烈建议谨慎。我们研究了使用Boxcar和三角形分布近似沿断层的投掷剖面的影响,并表明这可能低估或高估了应变率,其结果在我们最详细的应变率计算中处于72-237%的范围内。我们讨论如何在地震危险性计算中实现对野外结构数据中应变率计算中潜在隐含误差的更好理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号