首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Southern African Studies >FoodBank Johannesburg, State, and Civil Society Organisations in Post-Apartheid Johannesburg
【24h】

FoodBank Johannesburg, State, and Civil Society Organisations in Post-Apartheid Johannesburg

机译:约翰内斯堡粮食银行,约翰内斯堡的州和民间社会组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article analyses FoodBank Johannesburg's impact on the network of food security organisations in Johannesburg, South Africa. The introduction of the American food banking model into Johannesburg has led to many positive outcomes, including expanding the number of institutions committed to food security, streamlining food donation processes, increasing the amount of food delivered, and reducing waste. While FoodBank Johannesburg's alignment with the state and capital has assured some level of state funding, it also has the potential to delegitimise particular food security interventions, depoliticise hunger, deepen central state penetration, create new bureaucracies, and allow government to shirk responsibilities towards the food insecure. Additionally, even though food retailers and food manufacturers have committed to the food banking concept, it is not clear whether the food bank's dependence on food business inefficiencies, such as overproduction and incorrect packaging, is an appropriate way to ensure food security. Moreover, FoodBank Johannesburg has transformed non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based organisations (CBOs) through processes of inclusion and exclusion and legitimised a top-down approach towards food security that privileges particular food security interventions over others. For some NGOs, institutional stability has been ensured by changing the organisational mission, accessing private sector funding, or joining forces with FoodBank Johannesburg. Yet, for many NGOs and CBOs, resource unavailability, ineffective governmental policy, and new food bank bureaucracies pose potential institutional challenges and an uncertain future.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.617947
机译:本文分析了约翰内斯堡粮食银行对南非约翰内斯堡粮食安全组织网络的影响。约翰内斯堡采用美国食品银行模式已带来许多积极成果,包括扩大致力于食品安全的机构数量,简化食品捐赠程序,增加提供的食品数量并减少浪费。尽管约翰内斯堡食品银行与州和首都的联营关系确保了一定程度的州资金投入,但它也有可能使某些粮食安全干预措施合法化,将饥饿政治化,加深中央州的渗透力,建立新的官僚机构,并允许政府推卸对食品的责任不安全。此外,尽管食品零售商和食品制造商已承诺采用食品银行概念,但尚不清楚食品银行对食品生产效率低下(例如生产过剩和包装错误)的依赖是否是确保食品安全的适当方法。此外,约翰内斯堡食品银行通过包容和排斥的过程改造了非政府组织和社区组织,并使自上而下的粮食安全方法合法化,使特定的粮食安全干预措施比其他措施更具特权。对于某些非政府组织而言,机构的稳定是通过改变组织使命,获得私营部门的资金或与约翰内斯堡粮食银行联手来确保的。然而,对于许多非政府组织和CBO来说,资源匮乏,无效的政府政策以及新的食品银行官僚构成了潜在的体制挑战和不确定的未来。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.617947

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号