Recommended urban storm water infiltration devices for different types of run-off under varying hydrogeological conditions

摘要

constant rainfall, soils heterogeneity, macro-porous flow, particle-bounded transport and microbiological decomposition. Conclusions Based on the scale of risks to soils, seepage water and groundwater, the matrix should be used in the selection of the roof construction materials and appropriate storm water infiltration devices so that the environmental risks can be minimised. If the sub-ground has a high permeability and low adsorption capacities, the infiltration of metalliferous roof run-off water is, in general, not advisable without putting treatment facilities in place upstream. Thus, architects need to realise that the choice of a suitable infiltration device depends, on the one hand, on the type of run-off and, on the other hand, on the hydrogeological condition and the building materials. Recommendations and perspectives Replacement of the top-soil in swale infiltration devices is recommended because, in particular, heavy metal (zinc) in run-off from roofs with zinc gutters and down-pipes accumulates in the soil matrix. The replacement interval depends on the hydrogeological conditions and, for this run-off example, lies between 10 and 20 years. If infiltration is essential, constructing special treatment facilities upstream can be an alternative. The existing numerical model could be adapted to suit other site-specific materials and be enhanced regarding several complex impact factors.