...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of soil & sediments >Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in response to 3-year conservation tillage management in a sandy loam soil in North China
【24h】

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in response to 3-year conservation tillage management in a sandy loam soil in North China

机译:华北沙质壤土上3年保护性耕作对丛枝菌根真菌群落结构和多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose Modern agricultural science has greatly reduced the use of tillage. Monitoring conservation versus conventional tillage effects on soil microbes could improve our understanding of soil biochemical processes and thus help us to develop sound management strategies. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of conservation tillage on the spore community structure and the diversity of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and to find out the main factors that influence these parameters. Materials and methods A long-term field experiment established in a sandy loam soil in Northern China has received continuous tillage management treatments for 3 years, including conventional tillage (CT), no tillage (NT), and alternating tillage (AT). Topsoil samples (0-15 cm) from four individual plots per treatment were collected for the analysis of chemical properties and fungal parameters. AM fungal spores were isolated using the wet-sieving method and identified to species level based on morphology by light microscopy. The community structure and the diversity of AM fungi were evaluated using the following parameters: spore density, relative abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener index (H'), evenness (E), and Simpson's index (D). Jaccard index (J) of similarity was calculated to compare AM fungal species composition under different treatments. Results and discussion Twenty-eight species of AM fungi within four genera, Glomus, Acaulospora, Scutellospora, and Entrophospora, were recovered from the 12 plots within the three tillage management treatments. Higher spore density, species richness, and species diversity (H', E, and D) of AM fungi were observed in the two conservation tillage treatments, and the redundancy analysis showed that the species richness significantly correlated to soil organic carbon content (P<0.05). The positive effects of NT and AT on the species richness were very close, while the AT had relatively greater beneficial impacts on the spore density and the evenness of AM fungi compared to the NT. The lowest Jaccard index (J) of similarity in species composition was also observed between the AT and CT treatments. Conclusions Soil organic carbon, the spore density, and species richness and diversity of AM fungi increased in the two conservation tillage treatments. The species richness of AM fungi significantly correlated to soil organic carbon content (P<0.05). Compared with the CT treatment, the AT rather than the NT significantly increased the spore density and the evenness of AM fungi (P<0.05). Thus, alternating tillage practice may be more beneficial to agroecosystem in this region.
机译:目的现代农业科学大大减少了耕作的使用。监测保护与传统耕作对土壤微生物的影响可以增进我们对土壤生化过程的了解,从而帮助我们制定合理的管理策略。这项研究的目的是调查保护性耕作对孢子群落结构和土壤丛枝菌根(AM)真菌多样性的影响,并找出影响这些参数的主要因素。材料和方法在中国北方的沙质壤土上建立的长期田间试验已经接受了连续耕作管理处理3年,包括常规耕种(CT),无耕种(NT)和交替耕种(AT)。收集每种处理的四个单独样地的表土样品(0-15厘米),用于分析化学性质和真菌参数。使用湿筛分法分离AM真菌孢子,并通过光学显微镜根据形态将其鉴定为物种水平。使用以下参数评估AM真菌的群落结构和多样性:孢子密度,相对丰度,物种丰富度,香农-维纳指数(H'),均匀度(E)和辛普森指数(D)。计算相似性的Jaccard指数(J),以比较不同处理下的AM真菌物种组成。结果与讨论在三种耕作管理措施的12个样地中,从4个属Glomus,Acaulospora,Scutellospora和Entrophospora中获得了28种AM真菌。在两种保护性耕作处理中均观察到AM真菌具有较高的孢子密度,物种丰富度和物种多样性(H',E和D),冗余分析表明物种丰富度与土壤有机碳含量显着相关(P < 0.05)。 NT和AT对物种丰富度的积极影响非常接近,而与NT相比,AT对孢子密度和AM真菌的均匀度具有相对更大的有利影响。在AT和CT处理之间,也观察到物种组成相似性最低的Jaccard指数(J)。结论两种保护性耕作措施均提高了AM真菌的土壤有机碳,孢子密度,物种丰富度和多样性。 AM真菌的物种丰富度与土壤有机碳含量显着相关(P <0.05)。与CT处理相比,AT处理比NT处理显着提高了孢子密度和AM真菌的均匀度(P <0.05)。因此,交替耕作可能对该地区的农业生态系统更为有利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of soil & sediments 》 |2012年第6期| 835-843| 共9页
  • 作者单位

    Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotic Environment and Ecological Security in Anhui, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, East Beijing Road 1, Wuhu 241000, People's Republic of China;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Croucher Institute for Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China;

    Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, East Beijing Road 71, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,Croucher Institute for Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Alternating tillage; No tillage; Redundancy analysis; Soil organic carbon; Species richness; Spore density;

    机译:交替耕作;免耕;冗余分析;土壤有机碳;物种丰富度;孢子密度;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号