...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of soil & sediments >Evaluation of soil analytical methods for the characterization of alkaline Technosols: Ⅱ. Amorphous constituents and carbonates
【24h】

Evaluation of soil analytical methods for the characterization of alkaline Technosols: Ⅱ. Amorphous constituents and carbonates

机译:土壤分析方法表征碱性甲硝酚的评价:Ⅱ。非晶态成分和碳酸盐

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose The aims of this study were to identify potential sources of error in common methods for determination of amorphous oxide concentrations and carbonate concentrations, as applied to a Technosolic material (bauxite residue), and where possible, suggest improvements to the methods. Materials and methods An acid ammonium oxalate (AAO) extraction was applied to fresh and weathered bauxite residues, at soil to solution ratios varying from 1:100 to 1:800. Two methods for carbonate concentration were compared: the 'weight loss' method, and the 'difference in total C method. These were applied to six weathered bauxite residue samples, with CaCO_3 concentrations ranging from 0.1-2 % weight. Results and discussion Chemically extractable amorphous content was underreported in bauxite residue at the standard 1:100 extraction ratio, likely due to Al and Si saturation of the oxalate complex. A 1:400 soil: AAO ratio extracted the highest amount of amorphous material. Some crystalline minerals such as sodalite, inherited from the Technosolic parent material, were soluble in the acid ammonium oxalate extractant. The difference in total C method was more precise than the weight loss method for the determination of carbonate concentration in bauxite residues. Conclusions The high amorphous content of bauxite residues requires a wider soil to solution ratio (1:400) for acid ammonium oxalate extraction than is used for typical soil materials (1:100). The difference in total C method is recommended for the routine analysis of field samples where small variations in carbonate concentration need to be detected.
机译:目的本研究的目的是确定用于Technosolic材料(铝土矿残留物)的确定非晶态氧化物浓度和碳酸盐浓度的常用方法中潜在的误差源,并在可能的情况下提出改进方法的建议。材料和方法将酸草酸铵(AAO)萃取液用于新鲜和风化的铝土矿残留物,土壤与溶液的比例为1:100至1:800。比较了碳酸盐浓度的两种方法:“失重”方法和“总C差异法”。将它们应用于六个风化的铝土矿残留物样品,CaCO_3的浓度范围为0.1-2%重量。结果与讨论在标准的1:100萃取比下,铝土矿残渣中可化学萃取的无定形成分含量报告不足,这可能是由于草酸盐络合物的Al和Si饱和所致。 1:400的土壤:AAO比提取了最多量的无定形物质。从Technosolic母体材料继承的某些晶体矿物(如方钠石)可溶于酸性草酸铵萃取剂。总碳法的差异比重量损失法更精确,可用于确定铝土矿渣中碳酸盐的浓度。结论高浓度的铝土矿残留物比传统的土壤材料(1:100)需要更广泛的土壤与溶液比(1:400),用于酸草酸铵的提取。对于需要检测碳酸盐浓度小的变化的现场样品的常规分析,建议采用总C方法的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号