首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community >Vulnerable participants in health research: methodological and ethical challenges
【24h】

Vulnerable participants in health research: methodological and ethical challenges

机译:卫生研究中的弱势参与者:方法和道德挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ethical guidelines for conducting research are embedded in the Helsinki Declaration of 1964. We contend that these abstract and intentionally universal guidelines need to be appropriated for social and healthcare research, in which purpose and methods often deviate from medical research. The guidelines appear to be instrumental and over-simplistic representations of the often ‘messy’ realities surrounding the research process that is often guided by relational and local negotiations of ethical solutions. Vulnerable participants, for instance, challenge both professional and research ethics, leaving both professionals and researchers in ethical and moral dilemmas. In this article, we specifically focus on the methodological challenges of obtaining informed consent from drug users and terminally ill cancer patients in our PhD research. The question is how to illuminate the needs and problems of vulnerable patients and - at the same time - respect their integrity without exposing them unnecessarily. The article illuminates the interactional construction of roles and relationships and how they affect the contextual construction of vulnerability. In this respect, we demonstrate that both patients and researchers are at risk of being vulnerable. In conclusion, we outline and advocate for a more empirically informed ethics in research with potentially vulnerable participants.View full textDownload full textKeywordsvulnerable participants, ethics, informed consent, health researchRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.597188
机译:进行研究的伦理准则已嵌入1964年的《赫尔辛基宣言》。我们认为,这些抽象的,有意的普遍准则需要适用于社会和医疗保健研究,在这些研究中,目的和方法往往与医学研究背道而驰。指南似乎是对研究过程中经常“混乱”的现实的工具性和过于简单的表示,这些现实通常是由道德解决方案的关系和地方谈判来指导的。例如,弱势参与者挑战职业和研究道德,使职业和研究人员陷入道德和道德困境。在本文中,我们将重点关注在我们的博士研究中获得吸毒者和绝症患者的知情同意的方法挑战。问题是如何阐明弱势患者的需求和问题,同时在不不必要暴露他们的情况下尊重其完整性。本文阐述了角色和关系的交互构造以及它们如何影响脆弱性的上下文构造。在这方面,我们证明患者和研究人员都容易受到伤害。总而言之,我们概述并提倡在潜在弱势参与者的研究中提供更多以经验为依据的道德规范。查看全文下载全文关键字弱势参与者,道德规范,知情同意书,卫生研究citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.597188

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号