...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Seismology >An evaluation of 3-D velocity models of the Kanto basin for long-period ground motion simulations
【24h】

An evaluation of 3-D velocity models of the Kanto basin for long-period ground motion simulations

机译:关东盆地3D速度模型的长期地面运动模拟评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We performed three-dimensional (3-D) finite difference simulations of long-period ground motions (2–10 s) in the Kanto basin using the Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station (J-SHIS 2009), Yamada and Yamanaka (Exploration Geophysics 65(3):139–150, 2012) (YY), and Head Quarter for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP 2012) velocity models for two intermediate depth (68–80 km) moderate earthquakes (Mw 5.8–5.9), which occurred beneath the Kanto basin. The models primarily differ in the basic data set used in the construction of the velocity models. The J-SHIS and HERP models are the results of integration of mainly geological, geophysical, and earthquake data. On the other hand, the YY model is oriented towards the microtremor-array-observation data. We obtained a goodness of fit between the observed and synthetic data based on three parameters, peak ground velocities (PGVs), smoothed Fourier spectra (FFT), and cross-correlations, using an algorithm proposed by Olsen and Mayhew (Seism Res Lett 81:715–723, 2010). We found that the three models reproduced the PGVs and FFT satisfactorily at most sites. However, the models performed poorly in terms of cross-correlations especially at the basin edges. We found that the synthetics using the YY model overestimate the observed waveforms at several sites located in the areas having V s 0.3 km/s in the top layer; on the other hand, the J-SHIS and HERP models explain the waveforms better at the sites and perform similarly at most sites. We also found that the J-SHIS and HERP models consist of thick sediments beneath some sites, where the YY model is preferable. Thus, we have concluded that the models require revisions for the reliable prediction of long-period ground motions from future large earthquakes.
机译:我们使用日本地震灾害信息站(J-SHIS 2009),山田和山中(勘探地球物理学65)在关东盆地进行了长周期地震动(2-10s)的三维(3-D)有限差分模拟(3):139-150,2012年(YY),以及两个中等深度(68-80 km)中度地震(Mw 5.8-5.9)发生的地震研究促进总部(HERP 2012)速度模型关东盆地。这些模型的主要区别在于用于速度模型构建的基本数据集。 J-SHIS和HER​​P模型是主要整合了地质,地球物理和地震数据的结果。另一方面,YY模型是针对微震颤阵列观测数据的。我们使用Olsen和Mayhew(Seism Res Lett 81 :)提出的算法,基于三个参数,峰值地面速度(PGV),平滑傅立叶光谱(FFT)和互相关,获得了观测数据和合成数据之间的拟合优度。 715–723,2010)。我们发现,这三个模型在大多数站点上都能令人满意地再现PGV和FFT。但是,这些模型在互相关方面表现不佳,尤其是在盆地边缘。我们发现使用YY模型的合成器高估了位于顶层V s为0.3 km / s区域中几个位置处的观测波形;另一方面,J-SHIS和HER​​P模型在现场更好地解释了波形,并且在大多数现场表现相似。我们还发现,J-SHIS和HER​​P模型由某些位置下方的厚沉积物组成,其中YY模型更可取。因此,我们得出结论,为了可靠地预测未来大地震的长周期地震动,需要对模型进行修正。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号