首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Royal Statistical Society >Did you conduct a sensitivity analysis? A new weighting-based approach for evaluations of the average treatment effect for the treated
【24h】

Did you conduct a sensitivity analysis? A new weighting-based approach for evaluations of the average treatment effect for the treated

机译:您是否进行了敏感性分析?一种新的基于加权方法,用于评估治疗的平均治疗效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In non-experimental research, a sensitivity analysis helps determine whether a causal conclusion could be easily reversed in the presence of hidden bias. A new approach to sensitivity analysis on the basis of weighting extends and supplements propensity score weighting methods for identifying the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT). In its essence, the discrepancy between a new weight that adjusts for the omitted confounders and an initial weight that omits them captures the role of the confounders. This strategy is appealing for a number of reasons including that, regardless of how complex the data generation functions are, the number of sensitivity parameters remains small and their forms never change. A graphical display of the sensitivity parameter values facilitates a holistic assessment of the dominant potential bias. An application to the well-known LaLonde data lays out the implementation procedure and illustrates its broad utility. The data offer a prototypical example of non-experimental evaluations of the average impact of job training programmes for the participant population.
机译:在非实验研究中,敏感性分析有助于确定因果的结论是否在隐藏偏见的存在下可能很容易逆转。一种基于加权的敏感性分析的新方法延伸和补充了鉴定治疗(ATT)的平均治疗效果的倾向分数加权方法。在其本质上,新重量之间的差异调整省略的混乱和省略它们的初始重量捕获了混杂者的作用。此策略在包括多种原因,包括该策略,包括数据生成功能的复杂程度,灵敏度参数的数量仍然很小,它们的形式永远不会改变。灵敏度参数值的图形显示有助于对主导潜在偏差的整体评估。应用于众所周知的Lalonde数据的应用程序列出了实现过程,并说明了其广泛的实用程序。数据提供了对参与者人口的职业培训计划的平均影响的非实验性评估的典型例。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号