首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >The British Monopoly On The Surat Trade To The Middle East And The Indian Ship-Owning Merchants' Struggle Against It: 1759-1800
【24h】

The British Monopoly On The Surat Trade To The Middle East And The Indian Ship-Owning Merchants' Struggle Against It: 1759-1800

机译:英国对中东苏拉特贸易的垄断以及印度船东对之的斗争:1759-1800

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Between 1759 and 1800, Surat, still an important trade and financial centre, was under the ultimate rule of the East India Company. Although the EIC justified this as necessary for protecting Surat's inhabitants and, most particularly, the local merchant class, the Company failed not only to protect the Surat merchants against the depredations of Great Britain's European enemies, but also to safeguard the merchants from extortion by local EIC top officials. In fact, the latter imposed what was essentially a protection racket on trade from Surat to the Middle East. This article focuses on the Surat merchants' long-drawn out and ultimately unsuccessful struggle against what, in the official documents, was dubbed the [British] monopoly of the trade to the "Gulphs". The episode demonstrates two theses: the first is that the interests of the Surat merchants held little importance to the EIC or its officials, and the second is that, during the period under examination, no mutually beneficial partnership tied the British to the Surat merchants — rather, the relationship was one of naked exploitation by the former of the latter.
机译:1759年至1800年之间,苏拉特仍然是重要的贸易和金融中心,受东印度公司的最终统治。尽管EIC认为这样做对保护苏拉特的居民,尤其是本地商人阶层是必要的,但公司不仅未能保护苏拉特商人免受大不列颠欧洲敌人的掠夺,而且未能保护商人免遭当地勒索EIC高级官员。实际上,后者对从苏拉特到中东的贸易施加了本质上是保护性的打击。本文着眼于苏拉特商人与官方文件中被称为“英国”对“古尔夫斯”的贸易垄断的长期拖延而最终未成功的斗争。这一集表明了两个论点:第一个是苏拉特商人的利益对EIC或其官员不重要,第二个是在审查期间,没有互惠互利的伙伴关系将英国人与苏拉特商人联系在一起-相反,这种关系是后者前者的赤裸裸剥削之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号