首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Deliberation over new hydrogen energy technologies: evidence from two Citizens' Panels in the UK
【24h】

Deliberation over new hydrogen energy technologies: evidence from two Citizens' Panels in the UK

机译:对新氢能技术的审议:来自英国两个公民小组的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hydrogen energy and hydrogen energy technologies are still largely at the experimental and demonstration project stages. If the hydrogen is produced sus-tainably from renewable sources, it may be a potential means of reducing carbon dioxide emissions and achieving other environmental objectives. But hydrogen technologies are still 'emergent' - seeking a niche to compete against incumbent technologies in stationary and mobile applications. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (buses and automobiles) and hydrogen refuelling stations have been developed, but they have yet to become established in the market. Much attention has been given to technical risk assessment of hydrogen as a hazardous gas, but broader 'whole systems' appraisals of a hydrogen infrastructure (for domestic and transport uses) are lacking. Importantly, public risk perceptions are seen as crucial factors influencing acceptance or rejection. This paper examines qualitative evidence about public attitudes towards hydrogen energy technologies and compares results from two Citizens' Panels carried out recently in England and Wales. These Citizens' Panels enabled selected samples of the general public to question the experts and deliberate over the issues raised. The paper highlights unresolved questions concerning 'critical trust' of experts and other stakeholders, and citizens' demands for greater familiarity with the hydrogen technologies in practical, everyday settings, in order to offer judgements about their desirability and feasibility.
机译:氢能和氢能技术仍处于试验和示范项目阶段。如果氢气是可持续地由可再生资源生产的,则它可能是减少二氧化碳排放并实现其他环境目标的潜在手段。但是氢技术仍然是“新兴”技术,它在固定和移动应用中寻求与现有技术竞争的利基市场。已经开发了氢燃料电池车辆(公共汽车和汽车)和加氢站,但是它们尚未在市场上确立。人们已经对氢作为一种有害气体的技术风险评估给予了极大的关注,但是缺乏对氢基础设施(用于家庭和运输用途)的更广泛的“整个系统”评估。重要的是,公共风险感知被视为影响接受或拒绝的关键因素。本文研究了关于公众对氢能技术态度的定性证据,并比较了最近在英格兰和威尔士成立的两个公民小组的结果。这些公民小组使选定的公众样本能够对专家进行质疑并就提出的问题进行审议。本文着重强调了尚未解决的问题,这些问题涉及专家和其他利益相关者的“至关重要的信任”,以及公民对实际,日常环境中对氢技术的更多了解的需求,以便对它们的可取性和可行性做出判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号