首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Risk-based governance against national obstacles? Comparative dynamics of Europeanization in Dutch, French, and German flooding policies
【24h】

Risk-based governance against national obstacles? Comparative dynamics of Europeanization in Dutch, French, and German flooding policies

机译:针对国家障碍的基于风险的治理?荷兰,法国和德国洪水政策中欧洲化的比较动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Comparative studies have recently highlighted obstacles related to continental European countries' proclivity for adopting risk-based governance. However, so far, the interface between risk-based policy-making in the EU and potential policy change in reluctant member states has been underexplored. We compare flooding policies in the Netherlands with those in France and Germany to establish the extent to and conditions under which EU-level risk-based policies can transform national governance approaches. Drawing on the concept of Europeanization, we compare national adaptation pressures stemming from the EU floods directive, investigate adaptation dynamics, and account for transformations towards risk-based thinking. We find that Europeanization enabled a mainstreaming of risk-based flooding policies in France and Germany, as national actors used the EU as a venue to entice a desired policy rationalization and centralization. By contrast, and somewhat unexpectedly, the Netherlands partially retrenched from EU procedures because the directive's reporting mechanisms were considered to breach The Hague's aspirational policy approach. Overall, the paper identifies a strong potential for even 'soft' EU policies to ease national reluctance to risk-based governance approaches, but it also indicates limits where member states use risk-based techniques within an aspirational protection framework.
机译:比较研究最近强调了与欧洲大陆国家倾向于采用基于风险的治理有关的障碍。但是,到目前为止,在欧盟基于风险的决策与不愿加入成员国的潜在政策变化之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。我们将荷兰的洪水政策与法国和德国的洪水政策进行比较,以确定欧盟级基于风险的政策可以改变国家治理方式的程度和条件。利用欧洲化的概念,我们比较了欧盟洪水指令产生的国家适应压力,研究了适应动态,并解释了向基于风险的思维的转变。我们发现,欧洲化使法国和德国的基于风险的洪水策略成为主流,因为国家行为者将欧盟作为诱使所需的政策合理化和集中化的场所。相比之下,出乎意料的是,荷兰部分退出了欧盟程序,因为该指令的报告机制被认为违反了海牙的雄心勃勃的政策方针。总体而言,本文确定了即使是“软性”欧盟政策也有很大的潜力,可以缓解国家对基于风险的治理方法的不愿,但同时也指出了成员国在理想保护框架内使用基于风险的技术的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号