...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of retailing and consumer services >Price recall: Brand and store type differences
【24h】

Price recall: Brand and store type differences

机译:价格召回:品牌和商店类型的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Price is among the most important choice criteria for customers, whose price knowledge is often surprisingly inaccurate. This study aims at providing new insights into differences in price recall across brands and store types, and their potential effect on marketing efficiency and customers' store choice. Towards this aim, we analyze the price recall of consumers for 51 food items by a random-effects panel estimation employing a survey with 715 participants. Our results show that customers recall national brand prices better than private labels, almost irrespectively of the store type; consumers overestimate store brand prices in both store types; the effect, however, is much higher for the convenience store. These outcomes have consequences for the marketing strategy: despite a price-matching guarantee for the store brands in the convenience store, the price image is still in favor of the discounter. This result raises doubts on the effectiveness of the price-matching guarantee, at least in this context. The everyday low price strategy of the discounter seems to pay off in terms of the price image. Though both stores charge the exact same prices for their store brands, prices at the discounter are on average perceived to be significantly lower.
机译:价格是客户最重要的选择标准之一,他们的价格知识常常令人惊讶地不准确。这项研究旨在提供新的见解,以了解品牌和商店类型之间的价格召回差异以及它们对营销效率和顾客选择商店的潜在影响。为了实现这一目标,我们通过对715名参与者进行的调查,通过随机效应小组评估来分析51种食品的消费者价格召回。我们的结果表明,几乎与商店类型无关,客户回想起国家品牌价格要比自有品牌更好。消费者高估了两种商店类型的商店品牌价格;但是,对于便利店来说,效果要高得多。这些结果会对营销策略产生影响:尽管为便利店中的商店品牌提供了价格匹配的保证,但价格形象仍然有利于折扣店。至少在这种情况下,这一结果使人们对价格匹配保证的有效性产生怀疑。折扣店的日常低价策略似乎在价格形象方面得到了回报。尽管两家商店为其商店品牌收取完全相同的价格,但平均而言,折扣店的价格被认为要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号