首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Regional Science >How to improve the quality of life in peripheral and lagging regions by policy measures? Examining the effects of two different policies in Germany
【24h】

How to improve the quality of life in peripheral and lagging regions by policy measures? Examining the effects of two different policies in Germany

机译:如何通过政策措施提高周边和滞后地区的生活质量?检查两种不同政策在德国的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Peripheral regions commonly appear to be less attractive to live in and policymakers all over the world are applying various measures to make them more attractive. This paper analyzes the effects of two very different measures: The German municipal fiscal equalization scheme and the German structural funds for economically weak areas (GRW). It focusses on the impact on perceived quality of life, measured through interregional migration between German labor market regions. Using a spatial vector autoregressive panel model, we find evidence that equalization transfers have a significant positive impact on regional net migration and contribute to the aim of regional equity. These effects are especially found for regions with low endogenous fiscal capacities. GRW funding reveals no significant effects on net migration rates in total, but short-term effects in rural regions.
机译:周围地区通常似乎不太有吸引力,在世界各地的生活和政策制定者正在申请各种措施使他们更具吸引力。本文分析了两种不同措施的影响:德国市政财政均衡方案和德国结构基金在经济弱区(GRW)。它侧重于对生活质量的影响,通过德国劳动力市场地区之间的区域间迁移来衡量。使用空间向量自回归面板模型,我们发现均衡转移对区域净迁移产生了重大积极影响,并为区域股权的目标作出了贡献。尤其找到了具有低内源性财政能力的区域的效果。 GRW资金揭示了对净迁移率的显着影响,但农村地区的短期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号