首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy >Assumptions and Conclusions: Fundamental Distinctions Between Tibetan Buddhist and Western Approaches to Happiness
【24h】

Assumptions and Conclusions: Fundamental Distinctions Between Tibetan Buddhist and Western Approaches to Happiness

机译:假设和结论:藏传佛教与西方幸福方法的根本区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The cultivation of happiness is the stated goal of Tibetan Buddhism and of Western models of psychotherapy alike. Yet these two traditions differ sharply in their identification of the conditions that give rise to happiness. Since both traditions present themselves as empirical systems of investigation open to confirmation or refutation, it may prove useful for practitioners in each tradition to become familiar with each others’ theories and claims regarding the causes of happiness. This paper discusses the questions asked and models proposed by Western psychologists researching happiness and how these differ from the questions asked and models proposed by the Tibetan Buddhist tradition of psychology. It also presents an overview of scientific findings related to each of these models, and suggests possible benefits of investigating the basis for underlying assumptions of theories of happiness and the effects of such assumptions on the outcomes derived from different models of psychology.
机译:培养幸福是藏传佛教和西方心理治疗模式的既定目标。然而,这两种传统在确定产生幸福的条件上截然不同。由于这两种传统都表现为可以接受确认或反驳的实证研究体系,因此对于每种传统的实践者来说,熟悉彼此关于幸福成因的理论和主张可能很有用。本文讨论西方心理学家研究幸福的问题和模型,以及这些问题与藏传佛教传统心理学的问题和模型有何不同。它还概述了与每个模型有关的科学发现,并提出了调查幸福理论的基本假设的基础以及这些假设对源自不同心理学模型的结果的影响的潜在好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号