...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Media markets, special interests, and voters
【24h】

Media markets, special interests, and voters

机译:媒体市场,特殊利益和选民

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines the role of mass media in countering special interest group influence. I use the concentration of campaign contributions from Political Action Committees to proxy for special interests' capture of US Senate candidates from 1980 to 2002, and compare the reaction of voters to increases in concentration in two different types of media markets: in-state media markets and out-of-state media markets. Unlike in-state media markets, out-of-state markets focus on neighboring states' politics and elections. Thus, if citizens punish political capture, increases in concentration of special interest contributions to a particular candidate should reduce his vote share in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties, where the candidate receives less coverage. I find that a one-standard deviation increase in concentration of special interest contributions to incumbents reduces their vote share by about 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points in in-state counties relative to the out-of-state counties. Robustness checks suggest that these results are not driven by omitted Senator characteristics or by differences between in-state and out-of-state counties along dimensions other than the media environment.
机译:本文研究了大众媒体在抵抗特殊利益群体影响方面的作用。我使用政治行动委员会的竞选捐款的集中度来代表特殊利益对1980年至2002年美国参议院候选人的俘获,并比较选民对两种不同类型的媒体市场集中度的反应:州内媒体市场和州外媒体市场。与州内媒体市场不同,州外市场侧重于邻国的政治和选举。因此,如果公民惩罚政治俘虏,则对特定候选人的特殊利益贡献的集中度增加应相对于州外县减少其在州内县的选票份额,而州外县的候选人所占的覆盖范围则较小。我发现,州内县相对于州外县的特殊利益贡献集中度增加一个标准偏差会使他们的投票份额降低约0.5至1.5个百分点。健壮性检查表明,这些结果不是由参议员的遗漏特征引起的,也不是由州内和州外沿县(沿媒体环境以外)的差异所驱动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号