首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Election cycles and electricity provision: Evidence from a quasi-experiment with Indian special elections
【24h】

Election cycles and electricity provision: Evidence from a quasi-experiment with Indian special elections

机译:选举周期和电力供应:来自印度大选的准实验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We present evidence from India showing that state governments induce electoral cycles in electricity service provision. Our data and research strategy allow us to build on models of political business cycles and targeted distribution in two important ways. First, we demonstrate that by manipulating the flow of critical inputs into economic activity like electricity, elected leaders can influence economic outcomes even in contexts where they have constrained fiscal capacity. Second, we identify the effect of elections on electricity provision by focusing on special elections held for exogenous reasons. Our results show that state governments induce substantive increases in electricity service to constituencies that hold special elections. Manipulation of the power supply is stronger in contested constituencies and during special elections held in states where the government commands only a small majority. Overall, we find no evidence of positive welfare effects from the electoral manipulation of electricity supply. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们提供了来自印度的证据,这些证据表明州政府在电力服务提供中引发选举周期。我们的数据和研究策略使我们能够以两种重要方式建立政治经济周期模型和目标分配模型。首先,我们证明,通过操纵关键输入流向电力等经济活动的流动,民选领导人即使在财政能力受到约束的情况下也可以影响经济成果。第二,我们着眼于外生原因而举行的特别选举,从而确定选举对电力供应的影响。我们的结果表明,州政府促使举行特殊选举的选区的电力服务大幅增加。在有争议的选区和政府只占少数州的州举行的特别选举中,对电源的操纵更加强烈。总体而言,我们发现没有证据表明选举操纵电力供应会对福利产生正面影响。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号