...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economic theory >Factor Endowments, Democracy, and Trade Policy Divergence
【24h】

Factor Endowments, Democracy, and Trade Policy Divergence

机译:要素End赋,民主与贸易政策分歧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We develop a stochastic model of electoral competition in order to study the economic and political determinants of trade policy. We model a small open economy with two tradable goods, each of which is produced using a sector-specific factor (e.g., land and capital) and another factor that is mobile between these tradable sectors (labor); one nontradable good, which is also produced using a specific factor (skilled labor), and an elected government with the mandate to tax trade flows. The tax revenue is used to provide local public goods that increase the economic agents' utility. We use this general equilibrium model to explicitly derive the ideal policies of the different socioeconomic groups in society (landlords, industrialists, labor, and skilled workers). We then use those ideal policies to model the individual probabilistic voting behavior of the members of each of these socioeconomic groups. We use this model to shed light on how differences in the comparative advantages of countries explain trade policy divergence between countries as well as trade policy instability within countries. We regard trade policy instability to mean that, in equilibrium, political parties diverge in terms of the political platforms they adopt. We show that in natural resource (land)-abundant economies with very little capital, or in economies that specializes in the production of manufactures, parties tend to converge to the same policy platform, and trade policy is likely to be stable and relatively close to free trade. In contrast, in a natural resource-abundant economy with an important domestic industry that competes with the imports, parties tend to diverge, and trade policy is likely to be more protectionist and unstable.
机译:我们研究选举竞争的随机模型,以研究贸易政策的经济和政治决定因素。我们用两个可交易的商品为小型开放经济建模,每种商品都是使用特定于行业的因素(例如土地和资本)生产的,而另一个因素是在这些可交易的行业(劳动力)之间流动的;一种非贸易商品,也使用特定因素(熟练劳动力)生产,另外还有一个选举产生的政府,负责对贸易流量征税。税收用于提供当地公共物品,从而增加经济主体的效用。我们使用这种一般均衡模型来明确推导社会中不同社会经济群体(房东,工业家,劳工和熟练工人)的理想政策。然后,我们使用这些理想的策略来模拟这些社会经济群体中每个成员的概率投票行为。我们使用这种模型来阐明国家的比较优势的差异如何解释国家之间的贸易政策差异以及国家内部的贸易政策不稳定。我们认为贸易政策的不稳定意味着,在均衡状态下,各政党在采用的政治平台方面存在分歧。我们表明,在资本很少的自然资源(土地)丰富的经济体或专门从事制成品生产的经济体中,当事方倾向于趋同于同一政策平台,贸易政策可能会稳定并相对接近自由贸易。相反,在自然资源丰富的经济中,重要的国内产业与进口竞争,各方趋向于分歧,贸易政策可能更趋于贸易保护主义和不稳定。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of public economic theory》 |2014年第1期|119-156|共38页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1208, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA;

    Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1207, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA;

    Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1208, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号