...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economic theory >Does the Cost Paradox Preclude Technological Progress under Imperfect Competition?
【24h】

Does the Cost Paradox Preclude Technological Progress under Imperfect Competition?

机译:成本悖论是否会阻碍不完全竞争下的技术进步?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We consider a two-stage model of R&D/Cournot competition with isoelastic demand satisfying the cost paradox (i.e., that equilibrium profits increase with unit cost). The R&D process has a binary structure, with spillover effects. We provide a negative answer to the question in the title: Under noncooperative R&D, firms will conduct R&D for a broad parameter range, despite the presence of the cost paradox, as a result of being caught in a prisoner's dilemma. A second-best social planner is shown to have a higher propensity for R&D than the noncooperative scenario. However, if firms engaged in any of the known R&D cooperation scenarios, the answer to the question in the title would become affirmative. It follows that R&D cooperation leads to lower producer and consumer surpluses. This constitutes a major departure from the conclusions of the standard R&D model. Therefore, R&D cooperation in such environments should not receive favorable antitrust treatment.
机译:我们考虑具有满足成本悖论的等弹性需求的R / D /古诺竞争的两阶段模型(即均衡利润随单位成本的增加而增加)。研发过程具有二元结构,具有溢出效应。对于标题中的问题,我们提供否定答案:在非合作研发下,尽管存在成本悖论,但由于陷入囚徒困境,企业仍将在较宽的参数范围内进行研发。与非合作方案相比,第二好的社会计划者具有更高的研发倾向。但是,如果公司从事任何已知的R&D合作方案,则标题中对问题的答案将是肯定的。由此可见,研发合作导致生产者和消费者剩余减少。这与标准研发模型的结论大相径庭。因此,在这种环境下的研发合作不应受到有利的反托拉斯待遇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号