首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Psycholinguistic Research >Discourse Goals Affect the Process and Product of Nominal Metaphor Production
【24h】

Discourse Goals Affect the Process and Product of Nominal Metaphor Production

机译:话语目标影响名词隐喻产生的过程和产物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although a large number of studies have addressed metaphor comprehension, only a few attempts have so far been made at exploring the process of metaphor production. Therefore, in this paper, we address the problem of how people generate nominal metaphors or identify an apt vehicle for a given topic of nominal metaphors. Specifically, we examine how the process and product of metaphor production differ between two discourse goals of metaphor, namely an explanatory purpose (e.g., to clarify) and a literary purpose (e.g., to aesthetically pleasing). Experiment 1 analyzed the metaphors (or vehicles) generated in the metaphor production task, and demonstrated that people identified more prototypical exemplars of the property to be attributed to the topic as a vehicle for explanatory metaphors than for literary metaphors. In addition, it was found that metaphors generated for the explanatory purpose were more apt and conventional, and had high topic-vehicle similarity than those generated for the literary purpose, while metaphors generated for the literary purpose were more familiar and imageable than those for the explanatory purpose. Experiment 2 used a priming paradigm to assess the online availability of prototypical and less prototypical members of the topic property during metaphor production. The result was that both prototypical and less prototypical members were activated in producing literary metaphors, while neither members were activated in the production of explanatory metaphors. These findings indicate that the process of metaphor production is affected by discourse goals of metaphor; less prototypical members of the category are searched for a vehicle during the production of literary metaphors, and thus literary metaphors are generated with less prototypical vehicles than explanatory metaphors.
机译:尽管大量的研究都涉及隐喻理解,但是到目前为止,在探索隐喻产生的过程中只有很少的尝试。因此,在本文中,我们解决了人们如何生成名义隐喻或如何为给定的名义隐喻主题确定合适载体的问题。具体而言,我们研究了隐喻的两个话语目标,即解释性目的(例如,澄清目的)和文学性目的(例如,美学上令人满意)之间的隐喻产生过程和产物之间的区别。实验1分析了在隐喻生产任务中产生的隐喻(或媒介),并证明人们识别出比归因于文学隐喻的媒介更多的归因于该主题的原型样本是解释性隐喻的媒介。此外,发现用于解释目的的隐喻比用于文学目的的隐喻更贴切和传统,并且具有较高的主题-车辆相似性,而用于文学目的的隐喻比用于文学目的的隐喻更熟悉和可想象。说明性目的。实验2使用启动范例评估了隐喻产生过程中主题属性的原型成员和原型成员的在线可用性。结果是原型成员和原型较少的成员在产生文学隐喻时都被激活,而成员在解释性隐喻的产生中都没有被激活。这些发现表明,隐喻产生的过程受到隐喻话语目标的影响。在产生文学隐喻的过程中,会搜索较少种类的原型成员寻找媒介,因此,与解释性隐喻相比,文学隐喻的原型原型较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号