...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of product innovation management >Knowledge Development Approaches and Breakthrough Innovations in Technology-Based New Firms
【24h】

Knowledge Development Approaches and Breakthrough Innovations in Technology-Based New Firms

机译:技术型新企业的知识开发方法和突破性创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Compared to large established firms, technology-based new firms (TBNF) seem well placed to produce breakthrough innovations although questions remain as to their adeptness at subsequent exploitation. Building on the innovation and strategy literatures, the study identifies two different knowledge-development approaches or modes (business models) in TBNFsinternal versus externaland examines their relation to breakthrough innovation and subsequent progression of the product to market. The internal mode assembles knowledge inside the firm to generate its innovations, whereas the external mode relies heavily on alliances to develop and assemble knowledge among firms embedded in a creative network. The study uses a unique panel dataset of 69 UK new biotechnology firms over an 11-year period to explore this issue empirically. The findings show that the external knowledge-development mode is associated with more breakthrough innovations and a faster movement of innovations to market. The externally focused mode is not impeded by its relative lack of internal knowledge; it uses partners to access, assemble, and develop a wide scope of knowledge in a flexible manner. In addition, partners provide deep domain expertise to undertake the requisite deep-dives. In contrast, the internal mode has the huge challenge of assembling knowledge resources internally and suffers from a quicker onset of path dependence that impedes the generation of breakthroughs. This study provides a choice of business models (internal or external) that is associated with different breakthrough and speed to market performance outcomes. Going forward, policy makers and managers seeking breakthrough innovations, and speedy progression of the innovations to market should consider the potential resource efficiency of the external mode and the vital role played by collaborationssmall firm versus large firm and private versus public entities.
机译:与大型的成熟公司相比,以技术为基础的新公司(TBNF)似乎有能力产生突破性的创新,尽管仍然存在关于其在后续开发中的适应性的疑问。在创新和战略文献的基础上,该研究确定了内部与外部TBNF中的两种不同的知识开发方法或模式(业务模型),并研究了它们与突破性创新和产品随后推向市场的关系。内部模式在公司内部聚集知识以产生创新,而外部模式在很大程度上依赖联盟来开发和聚集嵌入创意网络中的公司之间的知识。这项研究使用了一个独特的面板数据集,该数据集由11家英国新生物技术公司组成,为期11年,从经验上探讨了这个问题。研究结果表明,外部知识开发模式与更多突破性创新和更快地将创新推向市场有关。外部关注模式不受其相对缺乏内部知识的阻碍;它使用合作伙伴以灵活的方式访问,组合和开发广泛的知识。此外,合作伙伴还提供深厚的领域专业知识,可以进行必要的深入研究。相比之下,内部模式在内部组装知识资源方面面临着巨大挑战,而且路径依赖的起效较快,阻碍了突破的产生。这项研究提供了与不同突破和加快市场绩效成果相关的业务模型(内部或外部)选择。展望未来,决策者和管理者寻求突破性创新,并迅速将创新推向市场,应考虑外部模式的潜在资源效率以及小企业与大型企业以及私人与公共实体之间的协作所起的关键作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of product innovation management 》 |2017年第4期| 492-508| 共17页
  • 作者单位

    City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, Strategy, London, England;

    City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, Strategy, London, England|City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, Strategy Grp, London, England;

    Old Dominion Univ, Strome Coll Business, Management, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号