...
【24h】

EDITORIAL

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This issue of the journal opens with an article, by Gledhill, which constitutes a statement of the 'state of the art' in political anthropology. This is followed by an article, by Clegg, which examines the 'foundations' of power in organizations. These articles constitute critical engagement with, and review of, the state of power research in their respective disciplines. Both articles engage the specialist in debate on the constitution of power research in an area while, simultaneously, providing the less specialist researcher with a set of guiding principles and directions to orient them. It is intended that these are the first of a number of critical reviews of disciplines that, over time, will cover all the social science disciplines. While of a slightly different register than the rest, the themes that emerge in these articles find resonance in the other articles and reviews. These include ground-breaking research on the social practices of power, the creation of power in everyday life, and the key theoretical debates on the nature of power and domination from both Enlightenment and, so-called, post-modern perspectives, which emerge as contested categories.
机译:该期杂志以格莱德希尔(Gledhill)的一篇文章开头,该文章构成了政治人类学中“最新技术”的陈述。接下来是克莱格(Clegg)的一篇文章,该文章探讨了组织中权力的“基础”。这些文章构成了各自学科中动力研究状态的重要参与和回顾。这两篇文章都使专家参与了有关某个地区的权力研究构成的辩论,同时,还为不那么专业的研究人员提供了一系列指导他们的指导原则和方向。打算将这些作为所有学科的批判性评论中的第一篇,随着时间的推移,它将涵盖所有社会科学学科。尽管与其他文章略有不同,但这些文章中出现的主题在其他文章和评论中引起共鸣。其中包括对权力的社会实践的开创性研究,日常生活中权力的创造,以及从启蒙运动和所谓的后现代视角对权力和统治的本质进行的重要理论辩论,有争议的类别。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of power》 |2009年第1期|1-7|共7页
  • 作者

    Mark Haugaard;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号