首页> 外文期刊>Journal of power sources >Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada
【24h】

Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada

机译:加拿大燃料电池和内燃机驱动的车辆的生命周期分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The transportation sector is responsible for a great percentage of the greenhouse gas emissions as well as the energy consumption in the world. Canada is the second major emitter of carbon dioxide in the world. The need for alternative fuels, other than petroleum, and the need to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gases emissions are the main reasons behind this study. In this study, a full life cycle analysis of an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) and a fuel cell vehicle (FCV) has been carried out. The impact of the material and fuel used in the vehicle on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions is analyzed for Canada. The data collected from the literature shows that the energy consumption for the production of 1 kg of aluminum is five times higher than that of 1 kg of steel, although higher aluminum content makes vehicles lightweight and more energy efficient during the vehicle use stage. Greenhouse gas regulated emissions and energy use in transportation (GREET) software has been used to analyze the fuel life cycle. The life cycle of the fuel consists of obtaining the raw material, extracting the fuel from the raw material, transporting, and storing the fuel as well as using the fuel in the vehicle. Four different methods of obtaining hydrogen were analyzed; using coal and nuclear power to produce electricity and extraction of hydrogen through electrolysis and via steam reforming of natural gas in a natural gas plant and in a hydrogen refueling station. It is found that the use of coal to obtain hydrogen generates the highest emissions and consumes the highest energy. Comparing the overall life cycle of an ICEV and a FCV, the total emissions of an FCV are 49% lower than an ICEV and the energy consumption of FCV is 87% lower than that of ICEV. Further, CO_2 emissions during the hydrogen fuel production in a central plant can be easily captured and sequestrated. The comparison carried out in this study between FCV and ICEV is extended to the use of recycled material. It is found that using 100% recycled material can reduce energy consumption by 45% and carbon dioxide emissions by 42%, mainly due to the reduced use of electricity during the manufacturing of the material.
机译:运输部门是世界上温室气体排放量和能源消耗的很大一部分。加拿大是世界上第二大二氧化碳排放国。这项研究背后的主要原因是,除了石油以外,还需要替代燃料,以及减少能源消耗和温室气体排放的需求。在这项研究中,已对内燃机汽车(ICEV)和燃料电池汽车(FCV)进行了完整的生命周期分析。加拿大分析了车辆中使用的材料和燃料对能源消耗和二氧化碳排放的影响。从文献中收集到的数据表明,生产1公斤铝的能耗是1公斤钢的能耗的五倍,尽管较高的铝含量使车辆轻量化且在车辆使用阶段更加节能。已使用温室气体调节的排放量和运输中的能源使用量(GREET)软件来分析燃料的生命周期。燃料的生命周期包括获取原材料,从原材料中提取燃料,运输和存储燃料以及在车辆中使用燃料。分析了四种不同的获取氢气的方法。在天然气厂和加氢站中,利用煤和核能发电并通过电解和天然气的蒸汽重整来产生氢并提取氢。已经发现,使用煤获得氢气会产生最高的排放并消耗最高的能量。比较ICEV和FCV的整个生命周期,FCV的总排放量比ICEV低49%,FCV的能耗比ICEV低87%。此外,可以很容易地捕获和隔离中心工厂中氢燃料生产过程中的CO_2排放。在这项研究中,FCV和ICEV之间的比较已扩展到使用再生材料。结果发现,使用100%的再生材料可以减少45%的能源消耗和42%的二氧化碳排放,这主要是由于在材料制造过程中减少了用电。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号