首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >Academic Knowledge Dissemination in the Mutual Fund Industry: Can Mutual Funds Successfully Adopt Factor Investing Strategies?
【24h】

Academic Knowledge Dissemination in the Mutual Fund Industry: Can Mutual Funds Successfully Adopt Factor Investing Strategies?

机译:共同基金行业中的学术知识传播:共同基金能否成功采用因素投资策略?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mutual funds tilted toward low-vol, value and small-cap factors outperformed a control group of mutual fund managers who didn't pursue the factor approach, according to this recent evidence-based research. The larger implication is that academic theories can indeed work well in practice, at least for the specific factors identified bv the authors.1.The net effect. Factor investing outperformed, even after taxes and fees.2.Loud and clear. Low-volatility, value and small-cap strategies strongly outperformed in the study.3.Mixed results. The performance of momentum and long-term reversal strategies, compared to the control group, was mixed. Short-term reversal strategies underperformed.Evidence-based practice is a term primarily used in medicine. It means that patients are treated based on evaluations and evidence gleaned from randomized clinical trials. For instance, a doctor will compare the death rate of patients who underwent a treatment in contrast to a controlled group who did not undergo treatment, and make practice decisions according to the results.
机译:根据这项最新的基于证据的研究,倾向于低数量,价值和小盘股因素的共同基金胜过不采用因素法的共同基金管理者对照组。更大的含义是,学术理论确实可以在实践中很好地发挥作用,至少对于作者确定的具体因素而言是有效的。即使在扣除税费之后,要素投资的表现也要好于市场2。低波动率,价值和小盘策略在本研究中表现明显优于3.混合结果。与对照组相比,动量和长期逆转策略的表现参差不齐。短期逆转策略的表现不佳。循证实践是主要用于医学的术语。这意味着将根据评估结果和从随机临床试验中收集的证据对患者进行治疗。例如,医生将比较接受过治疗的患者的死亡率与未接受治疗的对照组的死亡率,并根据结果做出决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号