首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >Fire! Fire! Is U.S. Low Volatility a Crowded Trade?
【24h】

Fire! Fire! Is U.S. Low Volatility a Crowded Trade?

机译:火!火!美国低波动性是拥挤的交易吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, low-volatility products and the research around them have received a great deal of media interest and investment activity. This begs the question: Is low volatility a crowded trade? Harry Marmer of Hillsdale Investment Management has studied the empirical evidence carefully and finds very little to support the notion that there is crowding in US low-volatility strategies at the present time.In an interview with Institutional Investor Journals, Marmer discusses the deep roots of low-volatility strategies and identifies the signals investors should use to assess the potential for crowding. He explains why performance significantly differs across different types of low-volatility approaches and suggests how to evaluate individual strategies. He also examines the outlook for rules-based quantitative strategies.
机译:在金融危机之后,低波动率产品及其周围的研究受到了媒体的广泛关注和投资活动。这就引出了一个问题:低波动性是一种拥挤的交易吗?希尔斯代尔投资管理公司的哈里·马默(Harry Marmer)仔细研究了经验证据,发现很少有人支持目前美国低波动性策略拥挤的观点。在接受《机构投资者期刊》的采访中,马默讨论了低利率的深层根源。波动性策略,并确定投资者应该用来评估潜在拥挤的信号。他解释了为什么性能在不同类型的低波动率方法之间存在显着差异,并提出了如何评估单个策略的建议。他还研究了基于规则的量化策略的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号