首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Ideologies >The third sector and political ideologies: unpacking relations between organized civil society and the state
【24h】

The third sector and political ideologies: unpacking relations between organized civil society and the state

机译:第三部门和政治意识形态:有组织的公民社会与国家之间的关系破裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In talking about ideologies, an outside view of Germany will commonly resort to Nazism and/or Communism. However, in discussing the third sector, neither of these will offer adequate reasoning for the present-day embeddedness of the sector. On the contrary, since both were destined to be historically surpassed, the former after only 12 years, they can present interesting case studies on the relationship between an independent sector and a totalitarian regime rather than put the sector in historical and societal perspective. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to show that present-day analyses of civil society in Germany that do not embrace a longer term historical viewpoint of German society will not achieve an adequate explanation for the complex relationship between organized civil society and the state. This approach reflects a basic unhappiness with a ‘boxing approach’, i.e. the attempt to reach a ‘one nation-one civil society tradition’ system, and therefore attempts to differentiate by using a critical historical methodology based on political theory rather than an empirical approach that would tend to blend out an historical viewpoint. Our central argument is that while at first sight corporatist embeddedness seems to exist, in fact, widely divergent role models and traditions of third sector organizations can be distinguished.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.513868
机译:在谈论意识形态时,德国的外部观点通常会诉诸纳粹主义和/或共产主义。但是,在讨论第三部门时,这些都不能为当前该部门的嵌入性提供充分的理由。相反,由于两者都注定要在历史上被超越,前者仅用了12年,他们就可以对独立部门与极权政权之间的关系进行有趣的案例研究,而不必从历史和社会的角度来研究这一部门。因此,本文的目的是表明,对德国公民社会的当今分析不包含德国社会的长期历史观点,将无法对有组织的公民社会与国家之间的复杂关系做出充分的解释。 。这种方法反映出一种基本的不满,即采用“拳击方法”,即试图达到“一个国家一民间社会传统”的系统,因此尝试通过使用基于政治的批判性历史方法来进行区分。理论,而不是将历史观点融合在一起的经验方法。我们的中心论据是,虽然乍一看似乎存在社团主义的嵌入感,但实际上,可以区分出第三部门组织的榜样和传统差异很大。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2010.513868

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号