首页> 外文期刊>Journal of policy modeling >The sustainability of Australia's current account deficits-A reappraisal after the global financial crisis
【24h】

The sustainability of Australia's current account deficits-A reappraisal after the global financial crisis

机译:澳大利亚经常账户赤字的可持续性-全球金融危机后的重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The heated debate over the sustainability of Australia's high current account deficit that raged over most of the fixed and floating exchange period was due to the failure of policymakers to shift from the Keynesian Mundell Fleming (KMF) paradigm which has been rendered obsolete by the floating of the Australian in 1983q4 to the Intertemporal Optimization (ITO) paradigm which was more appropriate under the floating exchange rate as advocated by a number of Australian economists in the Pitchford thesis. The Pitchford thesis contended that after the floating of the exchange rate the current account deficit was the residual outcome of rational optimizing decisions of private agents and if there was fiscal balance then the policy of targeting the reduction of the current account deficit based on the KMF paradigm was misconceived. Empirical tests based on the application of the net present value criterion using vector autoregressions, unit root and cointegration econometrics reveals that Australia's current account deficit revealed that the current account deficits were unsustainable during the fixed exchange period and over the whole study period 1960q3-2007q4, but not during the floating exchange rate period post-1983q4. Therefore the empirical results gave credibility to the Pitchford thesis but Australian policymakers continued to target the reduction of the current account deficit because their failure to make the paradigm shift from KMF to ITO to be consistent with the regime shift from a fixed to a floating exchange rate. However, in 2004 after more than two decades feuding Australian policymakers accepted the Pitchford thesis and abandon the policy of targeting the reduction of the current account deficit. But the global financial crisis and global recession has delivered a death blow to the Pitchford thesis by undermining the key assumptions of fiscal balance and rationality that underpins it. The fiscal stimulus package that has been implemented to combat the fall in aggregate demand and restore consumer confidence due to the global recession has resulted in massive fiscal imbalance and the credit crunch has undermined rational behavior and consumer confidence. Therefore, the Pitchford thesis no longer rules the policy roost after the global financial crisis. In this study we draw on the conflicting policy perspectives on the unsustainability of high US current account deficits that tender a malign prognosis based on Salvatore's twin deficit hypothesis and a benign prognosis based on Bernanke's global savings glut hypothesis to identify some key policy challenges that confront Australian policymakers to navigate the Australian economy out of the global financial crisis and recession into a robust recovery phase in the near future.
机译:在大多数固定和浮动汇率期间,围绕澳大利亚高额经常账户赤字的可持续性的激烈辩论是由于政策制定者未能从凯恩斯主义的蒙代尔·弗莱明(KMF)范式转变而来,该范式已因汇率浮动而过时了。 1983年第4季度澳大利亚人提出了跨期优化(ITO)范式,该范式在浮动汇率下更为合适,正如许多澳大利亚经济学家在Pitchford论文中所主张的那样。 Pitchford的论点认为,在汇率浮动之后,经常账户赤字是私人代理人合理优化决策的剩余结果,如果存在财政平衡,则基于KMF范式减少经常账户赤字的政策被误解了。根据使用向量自回归,单位根和协整计量经济学的净现值标准应用的实证检验表明,澳大利亚的经常账户赤字表明,在固定汇率兑换期内和整个研究期间(1960q3-2007q4),经常账户赤字是不可持续的,但不在1983q4之后的浮动汇率期间。因此,经验结果为Pitchford的论点提供了可信度,但澳大利亚决策者继续以减少经常账户赤字为目标,因为他们未能使范式从KMF转变为ITO,从而与政权从固定汇率向浮动汇率的转变保持一致。 。然而,在经历了二十多年的争执之后,2004年,澳大利亚决策者接受了Pitchford的论点,并放弃了旨在减少经常账户赤字的政策。但是,全球金融危机和全球经济衰退破坏了支撑财政平衡和合理性的关键假设,给Pitchford的论点带来了致命的打击。为应对总需求下降和恢复全球经济衰退引起的消费者信心而实施的财政刺激方案导致了严重的财政失衡,信贷紧缩破坏了理性行为和消费者信心。因此,在全球金融危机之后,Pitchford的论文不再统治政策。在本研究中,我们就高额经常账户赤字的不可持续性提出了相互矛盾的政策观点,这些高赤字基于萨尔瓦多的双赤字假说和基于伯南克全球储蓄过剩假说的良性预言,提出了恶性预后,从而确定了澳大利亚面临的一些关键政策挑战政策制定者将在不久的将来使澳大利亚经济摆脱全球金融危机和衰退,进入强劲的复苏阶段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号