首页> 外文期刊>Journal of planning literature >Curbing Sprawl with Development-limiting Boundaries in Urban China: A Review of Literature
【24h】

Curbing Sprawl with Development-limiting Boundaries in Urban China: A Review of Literature

机译:用中国限制发展的边界来遏制蔓延:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Facing the need to control urban sprawl, many Chinese cities are exploring the use of development-limiting boundaries, such as urban growth boundary (UGB) and urban development boundary (UDB), as required by the central government. Through a key word search of several databases including Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, we identified and reviewed hundreds of articles published in academic or professional journals. Our review shows that policy processes discussed in the literature have emphasized the technical aspect with analytical sophistication. We identified three types of approach to UGB and UDB in the literature: the growth-driven, the constraint-oriented, and the hybrid. While urban theories and modeling techniques that originated from Western countries have greatly influenced the analytical process underlying some of these approaches, the UGB/UDB policy debate and explorations were also responsive to China's unique urban and policy conditions. Despite the rich empirical content in the literature, very little research has been grounded in a scientific understanding of China's urban development. Issues such as intergovernmental coordination, policy enforcement, and evaluation were also inadequately addressed in the existing literature. The literature's newness may have been a major factor for these limitations. Our critique of the current literature may inspire new areas of research to generate knowledge that can inform China's continuous policy efforts to combat urban sprawl.
机译:面对控制城市扩张的需要,许多中国城市正在探索使用限制发展的边界,例如中央政府要求的城市增长边界(UGB)和城市发展边界(UDB)。通过对包括Web of Science和中国国家知识基础设施在内的多个数据库的关键词搜索,我们确定并审查了学术或专业期刊上发表的数百篇文章。我们的评论表明,文献中讨论的政策过程通过分析的复杂性强调了技术方面。我们在文献中确定了针对UGB和UDB的三种类型的方法:增长驱动型,面向约束型和混合型。尽管起源于西方国家的城市理论和建模技术极大地影响了其中一些方法的分析过程,但UGB / UDB的政策辩论和探索也响应了中国独特的城市和政策条件。尽管文献中有丰富的经验内容,但很少有研究基于对中国城市发展的科学理解。现有文献中也未充分解决政府间协调,政策执行和评估等问题。文献的新颖性可能是造成这些局限性的主要因素。我们对当前文学的批判可能会激发新的研究领域,以积累知识,从而为中国为打击城市蔓延所做的持续政策努力提供信息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of planning literature》 |2020年第1期|25-40|共16页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Univ Oregon Dept Planning Publ Policy & Management Eugene OR 97403 USA;

    Renmin Univ China Sch Publ Adm & Publ Policy Dept Urban Planning & Management Bldg Qiushi 430 59 Zhongguancun St Beijing 100872 Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ Coll Architecture & Landscape Architecture Beijing Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    planning practice; urban growth boundary; growth management; China;

    机译:规划实践;城市增长边界;成长管理;中国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号