首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Gladman Development Ltd v Wokingham BC
【24h】

Gladman Development Ltd v Wokingham BC

机译:Gladman Development Ltd诉BC Wokingham

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The claimant developer (G) applied to quash a development plan which had been adopted by the defendant local planning authority following an examination by a planning inspector. The plan was concerned with the allocation of sites within Wokingham for proposed residential development. It set out a series of policies which were intended to identify suitable locations. It proceeded on the basis that the number of new houses for which it was identifying appropriate locations was the number identified in the 2010 core strategy, namely at least 13,230 dwellings over a 20-year period from 2006 to 2026. The inspector concluded that the plan had deficiencies and that he could not recommend it for adoption. However, he suggested modifications which, if accepted, would ensure that the plan met the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 s.20(5) and the criteria for soundness. The local planning authority made the proposed modifications and certain other minor modifications. It was G's case that the inspector had failed to have regard to parts of the National Planning Policy Framework in considering whether the plan was sound. In particular, G contended that there was a failure to identify the objectively assessed need for housing in the area in accordance with the Framework. The court had to determine whether: (ⅰ) the inspector had considered what the objectively assessed need for housing in Wokingham was; (ⅱ) the inspector could assess the soundness of the plan without also having an objective assessment of what further additional housing provision might be required in due course; (ⅲ) the inspector had failed to determine whether there was a five-year supply of housing land available, or, if he had determined that issue, whether he gave adequate reasons for his conclusion; and (ⅳ) G could amend its claim to allege that the local planning authority had erred in law by giving assurances to the inspector as to changes it would make to the plan, but then adopting it without making those changes.
机译:原告开发商(G)在计划检查员审查后,申请撤销了被告当地计划部门通过的一项发展计划。该计划涉及在沃金厄姆内分配拟议的住宅开发用地。它制定了一系列旨在确定合适位置的政策。它的依据是,它正在为其确定合适位置的新房屋数量是2010年核心战略中确定的数量,即在2006年至2026年的20年中,至少有13230套住房。检查员得出结论,该计划有缺陷,他不能推荐采用它。但是,他提出了修改建议,这些修改如果被接受,将确保计划符合《 2004年计划和强制性购买法》第20(5)条的要求以及健全性标准。当地规划部门进行了建议的修改和某些其他较小的修改。在G的案件中,检查员在考虑计划是否合理时没有考虑到国家计划政策框架的某些部分。 G特别指出,未能根据框架确定经过客观评估的该地区住房需求。法院必须确定是否:(ⅰ)检查员考虑了客观评估的沃金厄姆住房需求。 (ⅱ)检查员可以评估计划的合理性,而不必客观评估在适当的时候可能还需要增加什么住房; (ⅲ)检查员未能确定是否有五年的可用住房土地供应,或者如果他确定了这个问题,他是否给出了得出结论的充分理由; (ⅳ)G可以修改其声称,声称当地计划当局在法律上犯了错误,方法是向检查员保证将对计划进行的更改,但随后采纳而未进行更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号