首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of McClellan) v Lambeth LBC
【24h】

R. (on the application of McClellan) v Lambeth LBC

机译:R.(在McClellan的申请中)v Lambeth LBC

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The claimant (M), a local resident, applied for judicial review of the defendant local authority's decision to fell a tree in a conservation area. The tree, which was 70-80 years old, was located near a grade Ⅱ listed building. The local authority commissioned a report from an arboriculturalist and another from a surveyor. They found that the tree had had no adverse effect on the building, but cracks had appeared in a nearby boundary wall. A local authority officer decided that, on the reports' recommendation, the tree should be removed in order to protect the building. M objected and provided an independent expert report which concluded that there was a low risk of damage from the tree's roots or of subsidence. Nevertheless, the local authority's cabinet confirmed the officer's decision. M argued that the local authority: (1) was subject to the duty under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s.72, but had failed to give special attention, as required by s.72(1), to whether the preservation of the tree would be desirable in the interests of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the conservation area; and (2) had failed to take into account a material consideration, namely that the tree was in a conservation area.
机译:原告(M)是当地居民,请求对被告地方当局砍伐保护区树木的决定进行司法审查。这棵树的树龄为70-80年,位于二级保护建筑附近。地方当局委托树木栽培专家和测量师提交了一份报告。他们发现树对建筑物没有不利影响,但附近的边界墙出现了裂缝。一位当地政府官员决定,根据报告的建议,应将树木移除以保护建筑物。 M反对并提供了一份独立的专家报告,该报告得出的结论是,树木的根部或下陷的风险很小。不过,地方当局内阁确认了该官员的决定。 M辩称,地方当局:(1)受到1990年《规划(列出的建筑物和保护区)法》第72条规定的职责,但没有按照第72条第(1)款的规定给予特别注意为了保护或改善保护区的特征或外观,是否需要对树木进行保护; (2)没有考虑到实质性考虑,即该树在保护区内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号