首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of Skillcrown Homes Ltd) v Dartford BC
【24h】

R. (on the application of Skillcrown Homes Ltd) v Dartford BC

机译:R.(在Skillcrown Homes Ltd的申请中)v达特福德BC

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This was a claim for judicial review of the decision of Dartford BC ("the Council") to decline to determine a planning application pursuant to s.70A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ("the 1990 Act"). The planning application was for redevelopment of land to include the replacement of two existing houses with eight houses. Outline planning permission had been granted in 1988 for 13 houses but that permission had lapsed. Subsequent applications were made in 1990 and 2005 and in 2008, an application for eight houses was refused and an appeal was dismissed. In September 2010, an application was made for eight houses by the present claimant. The application was refused but an appeal was allowed in 2011. The appeal decision was quashed in March 2012 and the matter was remitted to the Secretary of State who dismissed it in October 2012. The Inspector had concluded that the proposal would have the benefit of providing additional housing but it would have a relatively high level of dependence on travel by car and would result in some harm to biodiversity. He considered that those factors outweighed the benefit of the proposal.
机译:这是要求对达特福德·不列颠哥伦比亚省(“理事会”)拒绝根据1990年《城市和乡村计划法》(“ 1990年法案”)第70A条确定规划申请的决定进行司法审查的要求。计划申请是用于土地再开发,包括用八座房屋替换两座现有房屋。 1988年批准了13栋房屋的总体规划许可,但该许可已失效。随后在1990年和2005年提出了申请,并在2008年提出了关于八所房屋的申请,但上诉被驳回。 2010年9月,本索赔人提出八座房屋的申请。申请被拒绝,但于2011年允许上诉。上诉决定于2012年3月被撤消,此事已退回国务卿,国务卿于2012年10月将其驳回。检查专员得出结论认为,该提案将有利于提供额外的住房,但对汽车出行的依赖程度相对较高,会对生物多样性造成一定的损害。他认为这些因素超过了提案的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号