首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >(1) JB Trustees Ltd, (2) Phillip Jeans, (3) Sandra Jeans as trustees for Seymour Holdings Pension Fund v (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, (2) Broadland DC, and (3) Dennis Jeans Developments Ltd
【24h】

(1) JB Trustees Ltd, (2) Phillip Jeans, (3) Sandra Jeans as trustees for Seymour Holdings Pension Fund v (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, (2) Broadland DC, and (3) Dennis Jeans Developments Ltd

机译:(1)JB Trustees Ltd,(2)Phillip Jeans,(3)Sandra Jeans是Seymour Holdings Pension Fund v(1)社区和地方政府大臣,(2)Broadland DC和(3)Dennis Jeans发展有限公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In proceedings under s.288 of the 1990 Act, unlike claims for judicial review and appeals in enforcement cases under s.289, there is no permission filter. There is therefore no way in which the court can prevent the delay and expense involved in clearly unmeritorious cases going to a full hearing. I think this is such a case. But anyway, for the reasons I have given, the application must be dismissed.
机译:在根据1990年法案第288条进行的诉讼中,与根据第289条进行司法审查和执行案件中的上诉的要求不同,没有许可过滤器。因此,法院没有办法阻止显然毫无价值的案件的延误和费用付诸充分听证。我认为是这种情况。但是无论如何,由于我给出的原因,必须驳回该申请。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号