首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of David Gate on behalf of Transport Solutions for Lancaster and Morecambe) v Secretary of State for Transport and Lancashire CC
【24h】

R. (on the application of David Gate on behalf of Transport Solutions for Lancaster and Morecambe) v Secretary of State for Transport and Lancashire CC

机译:R.(代表David Gate代表Lancaster和Morecambe的运输解决方案提出的申请)v运输和兰开夏郡国务卿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For the reasons given above, therefore, each of the five grounds relied upon by the claimant fails and the application for judicial review also fails. Comment. This neatly laid out and commendably concise judgment addresses a variety of issues on the newish development consent regime under the Planning Act 2008. The analysis of the whole scheme, connected purposes and associated development is very useful. The extent to which a highway is for a purpose connected with a Secretary of State highway will vary. If the Secretary of State element of the project is small it is important that the tail does not wag the dog, to borrow an expression used by the judge in a different context at [27].
机译:因此,由于上述原因,索赔人所依据的五项理由中的每一项均不成立,司法复审申请也失败了。评论。简洁明了且值得称赞的简洁判断解决了《 2008年规划法》中有关新发展许可制度的各种问题。对整个计划,相关目的和相关发展进行分析非常有用。公路与国务卿公路相连的目的程度将有所不同。如果该项目的国务卿人数很小,则重要的是尾巴不要摇动狗,借用法官在其他情况下使用的表达[27]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号