首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Peace Education >‘The Other’ - a threat or a resource? Polar interpretations of two children’s stories: ‘The ugly duckling’ by H.C. Andersen and ‘Raspberry Juice’ by H. Shenhav
【24h】

‘The Other’ - a threat or a resource? Polar interpretations of two children’s stories: ‘The ugly duckling’ by H.C. Andersen and ‘Raspberry Juice’ by H. Shenhav

机译:“其他”-威胁还是资源?对两个孩子的故事的极性解释:H.C.的“丑小鸭”。 H. Shenhav撰写的Andersen和“ Raspberry Juice”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the educational work towards tolerance by analyzing two opposed social views in children’s stories: ‘The ugly duckling’ by H.C. Andersen and ‘Raspberry Juice’ by H. Shenav. ‘The ugly duckling’ depicts a social state based on the evolutional ladder, where the white entity is at the top, and the black one is at the bottom, concluding that multicultural society is an artificial order that is not recommended. ‘Raspberry Juice’ describes a social order based on cultural relativism where each entity is on equal footing, concluding that diversity encourages cooperative intercultural relations, widens ones’ horizons and promotes personal growth. The approach is interdisciplinary in scope, and, thus, it offers perspectives ranging from literary analysis, anthropological study and critical thinking skills. It provides teachers with the opportunity to develop social awareness in their classrooms and their students’ critical thinking skills, necessities in a democratic society. Figure 5 can be regarded as a litmus test when choosing a social text/program/activity aimed at teaching democratic values.View full textDownload full textKeywordseducation, multiculturalism, ‘the Other’, social values, racism, critical thinking skills, democracyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.553374
机译:本文通过分析儿童故事中两种对立的社会观点,考察了对宽容的教育工作:H.C.的“丑小鸭”。 H. Shenav撰写的Andersen和“ Raspberry Juice”。 “丑小鸭”描绘了一种基于进化阶梯的社会状态,其中白色实体在顶部,黑色实体在底部,这表明不建议使用多元文化社会。 “树莓汁”描述了一种基于文化相对论的社会秩序,其中每个实体都处于平等地位,认为多样性鼓励了跨文化的合作关系,拓宽了人们的视野并促进了个人成长。这种方法是跨学科的,因此,它提供了从文学分析,人类学研究和批判性思维技能等角度出发的观点。它为教师提供了在课堂上发展社会意识以及学生的批判性思维技能以及民主社会中必需品的机会。当选择旨在教授民主价值观的社会文本/程序/活动时,图5可被视为试金石。 var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.553374

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号