...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ornithology >Reproductive biology of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge
【24h】

Reproductive biology of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge

机译:欧洲布谷鸟Cuorus的生殖生物学:早期见识,持续存在的错误和知识的获得

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The brood parasitic habits of the European Cuckoo Cuculus canorus have excited wonder, disbelief and speculation since the fourth century BC. Accurate knowledge of cuckoo biology, however, accumulated only slowly and mostly since 1700. The aim of this study is to review six main topics: (1) the placement of cuckoo eggs in host nests; (2) cuckoo ‘clutch’ size; (3) cuckoo egg characteristics, mimicry and rejection; (4) choice of hosts; (5) eviction of eggs and chicks; and (6) the reasons why cuckoos are brood parasites and are incapable of rearing their own young. Early errors in reporting cuckoo biology were often a consequence of poor or incomplete observations leading to erroneous interpretations. Many of the early observers were egg collectors who focussed almost exclusively on the egg-laying period, thus ignoring cuckoo chick biology. Major landmarks in cuckoo studies included the facts that: (1) cuckoo eggs often resembled those of their hosts (1760s) and that this mimicry was adaptive (1850s); (2) hosts sometimes evicted cuckoo eggs (1770s); (3) female cuckoos laid individually distinctive eggs and that specific cuckoo gentes may exist (1850s); and (4) although well recognised that cuckoo chicks were reared alone, prior to Jenner’s work in the 1780s female cuckoo parents were thought to either eat or evict the host eggs or young. Jenner’s results was more readily accepted in Britain than in Germany. Between 1700 and 1859, cuckoo brood parasitism was difficult to reconcile with the prevalent conceptual framework of physico-theology (later known as the argument from design). Thereafter, Darwin’s idea of natural selection provided a superior conceptual framework, which in conjunction with experimental testing of specific hypotheses has continued to advance our understanding of brood parasitism. Our knowledge of cuckoo biology is far from complete, however, and we predict that continuing research often incorporating new technologies will refine and extend our understanding of the cuckoo’s extraordinary biology. Keywords Brood parasitism - Physico-theology - Cuckoo gentes - Field experiments Communicated by F. Bairlein.
机译:自公元前四世纪以来,欧洲杜鹃Cuculus canorus的幼虫寄生习性引起了人们的惊奇,怀疑和猜测。但是,从1700年开始,对杜鹃生物学的准确了解才慢慢积累,并且大部分是在这方面积累的。本研究的目的是回顾六个主要主题:(1)将杜鹃蛋放置在寄主巢中; (2)布谷鸟的“离合器”尺寸; (3)杜鹃卵的特征,模仿和排斥; (4)主持人的选择; (5)驱逐鸡蛋和小鸡; (6)杜鹃是种寄生虫且不能养育自己的幼虫的原因。布谷鸟生物学报告中的早期错误通常是由于观察结果不佳或不完整而导致错误的解释。许多早期的观察者是卵收集者,他们几乎完全专注于产卵期,因此忽略了杜鹃雏鸟的生物学特性。杜鹃研究的主要标志性事实包括:(1)杜鹃蛋通常类似于它们的寄主卵(1760年代),并且这种模仿是适应性的(1850年代); (2)寄主有时会驱逐杜鹃蛋(1770年代); (3)母杜鹃产下独特的卵,并且可能存在特定的杜鹃绅士(1850年代); (4)尽管公认杜鹃小鸡是单独饲养的,但在詹纳(Jenner)于1780年代开展工作之前,雌杜鹃的父母被认为可以吃或驱逐寄主卵或幼卵。詹纳的结果在英国比在德国更容易被接受。在1700年至1859年之间,布谷鸟育雏的寄生虫很难与流行的物理神学概念框架(后来称为设计论证)相协调。此后,达尔文的自然选择思想提供了一个卓越的概念框架,结合特定假设的实验检验,继续提高了我们对育雏寄生的理解。但是,我们对布谷鸟生物学的了解还远远不够,并且我们预测,经常采用新技术进行的持续研究将完善和扩展我们对杜鹃非凡生物学的理解。关键词巢寄生-生理神学-杜鹃(Cuckoo gentes)-田间试验由F. Bairlein沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号