Why rules rather than discretion: When the leadership intends to transform a desired policy into reality

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to explore why rules might be better than managerial discretion when the leadership intends to transform a desired policy into reality. Design/methodology/approach - Leaders need discretion in order to deal with the great expectation demanded on them. However, discretion can open up to threats to the leadership's pursuits of rational acting. The first threat is related to emotion and impulsive behaviour and the second threat is related to conflict and opportunistic behaviour. The paper examines these threats. Findings - In order to handle threats to rational acting the leadership has to establish and follow appropriate rules. Originality/value - The paper challenges the notion that the leadership should be provided with ample discretion when they intend to transform an intended policy into reality. The paper claims that unbridled discretion might be risky and proposes that the critical and neglected challenge is to establish appropriate rules that channel and focus leadership effort.