首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Infliximab plus Prednisone or Placebo plus Prednisone for the Initial Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Randomized Trial
【24h】

Infliximab plus Prednisone or Placebo plus Prednisone for the Initial Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Randomized Trial

机译:英夫利昔单抗加泼尼松或安慰剂加泼尼松用于风湿性多肌痛的初始治疗:一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A reliable alternative to steroids for treating polymyalgia rheumatica has not yet been identified. Although infliximab has been used occasionally in steroid-resistant cases, its efficacy has not been demonstrated in a controlled study. nnObjective: To compare the efficacy of prednisone plus infliximab with that of prednisone plus placebo in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica. nnDesign: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. nnSetting: 7 rheumatology clinics in Italy. nnPatients: 51 patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica. Patients with associated giant cell arteritis and those who had been previously treated with steroids or biological or immunosuppressive agents were excluded. nnIntervention: Initial therapy with oral prednisone tapered from 15 mg/d to 0 mg/d over 16 weeks according to a standard protocol, plus infusions of placebo or infliximab, 3 mg/kg of body weight, at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22. nnMeasurements: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients without relapse or recurrence through week 52. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients no longer taking prednisone, the number of relapses and recurrences, the duration of prednisone therapy, and the cumulative prednisone dose. nnResults: Four patients (3 in the infliximab group and 1 in the placebo group) did not complete the trial. The proportion of patients who were free of relapse and recurrence at 52 weeks did not differ between groups (6 of 20 patients [30%] in the infliximab group vs. 10 of 27 patients [37%] in the placebo group; adjusted risk difference, −3 percentage points [95% CI, −31 to 24 percentage points]; P = 0.80). In a sensitivity analysis that included dropouts, the best-case scenario yielded a difference of 5 percentage points (CI, −21 to 31 percentage points) between the groups. The secondary outcomes at weeks 22 and 52 did not differ between the groups. nnLimitations: The study had a small sample and a short follow-up. A low dosage of infliximab was used, and the prednisone dosage was rapidly tapered. nnConclusions: Although too small to be definitive, the trial provides evidence that adding infliximab to prednisone for treating newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica is of no benefit and may be harmful. If there is benefit, it is unlikely to be large. nnAustralian Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN012606000205538.
机译:尚未确定可替代类固醇治疗风湿性多肌痛的可靠方法。尽管英夫利昔单抗偶尔用于耐类固醇的病例,但在对照研究中尚未证明其有效性。 nn目的:比较泼尼松联合英夫利昔单抗与泼尼松联合安慰剂对新诊断的风湿性多肌痛患者的疗效。 nnDesign:随机,安慰剂对照试验。地点:意大利的7个风湿病诊所。患者:51例新诊断的风湿性肌痛。排除了伴有巨细胞动脉炎的患者以及以前接受过类固醇或生物或免疫抑制剂治疗的患者。 nn干预:按照标准方案,在16周内口服泼尼松从15 mg / d逐渐降低至0 mg / d的初始治疗,在第0、2、6、6周时加上安慰剂或英夫利昔单抗(3 mg / kg体重)。 14和22。nnMeasures:主要疗效终点是至52周没有复发或复发的患者比例。次要结局是不再服用泼尼松的患者比例,复发和复发的次数,泼尼松治疗的持续时间,和泼尼松累积剂量。结果:4名患者(英夫利昔单抗组3名,安慰剂组1名)未完成试验。两组之间无复发和在52周复发的患者比例没有差异(英夫利昔单抗组20例中有6例[30%],而安慰剂组27例中有10例[37%];校正后的风险差异,-3个百分点[95%CI,-31至24个百分点]; P = 0.80)。在包括辍学率的敏感性分析中,最佳情况下的两组之间的差异为5个百分点(CI,-21至31个百分点)。两组之间在第22和52周的次要结局无差异。 nn局限性:该研究样本少,随访时间短。使用低剂量的英夫利昔单抗,泼尼松剂量迅速减少。结论:尽管太小,无法确定,该试验提供的证据表明,在泼尼松中加入英夫利昔单抗治疗新诊断的风湿性多肌痛没有益处,而且可能有害。如果有收益,它不可能很大。 nn澳大利亚临床试验注册号:ACTRN012606000205538。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号