...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Screening for Osteoporosis in Men: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Guideline
【24h】

Screening for Osteoporosis in Men: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Guideline

机译:男性骨质疏松症的筛查:美国医师学院指南的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Screening for low bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the primary way to identify asymptomatic men who might benefit from osteoporosis treatment. Identifying men at risk for low BMD and fracture can help clinicians determine which men should be tested. nnPurpose: To identify which asymptomatic men should receive DXA BMD testing, this systematic review evaluates 1) risk factors for osteoporotic fracture in men that may be mediated through low BMD and 2) the performance of non-DXA tests in identifying men with low BMD. nnData Sources: Studies identified through the MEDLINE database (1990 to July 2007). nnStudy Selection: Articles that assessed risk factors for osteoporotic fracture in men or evaluated a non-DXA screening test against a gold standard of DXA. nnData Extraction: Researchers performed independent dual abstractions for each article, determined performance characteristics of screening tests, and assessed the quality of included articles. nnData Synthesis: A published meta-analysis of 167 studies evaluating risk factors for low BMD–related fracture in men and women found high-risk factors to be increased age (>70 years), low body weight (body mass index <20 to 25 kg/m2), weight loss (>10%), physical inactivity, prolonged corticosteroid use, and previous osteoporotic fracture. An additional 102 studies assessing 15 other proposed risk factors were reviewed; most had insufficient evidence in men to draw conclusions. Twenty diagnostic study articles were reviewed. At a T-score threshold of −1.0, calcaneal ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 66% for identifying DXA-determined osteoporosis (DXA T-score, −2.5). At a risk score threshold of −1, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Screening Tool had a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 68% to identify DXA-determined osteoporosis. nnLimitation: Data on other screening tests, including radiography, and bone geometry variables, were sparse. nnConclusion: Key risk factors for low BMD–mediated fracture include increased age, low body weight, weight loss, physical inactivity, prolonged corticosteroid use, previous osteoporotic fracture, and androgen deprivation therapy. Non-DXA tests either are too insensitive or have insufficient data to reach conclusions. nnOsteoporosis in men is substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated in the United States and worldwide (1). Looker and colleagues (2), evaluating the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database in 1997, estimated that between 300 000 and 2 million Americans older than age 50 years have osteoporosis and up to 13 million may have low bone mass. A 60-year-old white man has a 25% lifetime risk for an osteoporotic fracture (3), and the consequences of the fracture can be severe. The 1-year mortality rate in men after hip fracture is twice that in women (1). Diagnostic evaluation and treatment of men at high risk for fracture remains low, despite the prevalence of this condition in men (1, 4). nnDual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard test for diagnosing osteoporosis in people without a known osteoporotic fracture. It is, however, an imperfect test, identifying less than one half of the people who progress to have an osteoporotic fracture. For example, in the Rotterdam Study (5), the sensitivity of DXA-determined osteoporosis was only 44% and 21% in identifying elderly women and men, respectively, who subsequently had a nonvertebral fracture. Clearly, factors other than low bone mass are important in identifying patients at elevated risk for osteoporotic fracture. An increased risk for falling may explain why some factors are identified as risk factors for osteoporotic fractures independent of bone mineral density (BMD) (for example, tricyclic antidepressants) (6). Although imperfect, a strong and graded relationship exists between DXA-determined BMD and future osteoporotic fracture in women and men (7, 8). The Rotterdam Study (7) reported that the incidence of vertebral and hip fracture approximately doubled for every SD decrease in BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively. Furthermore, pharmacologic treatment of men with low DXA-determined BMD has been shown to decrease the risk for subsequent fractures (9). nnSome organizations have called for universal screening of older men with DXA testing (5, 10). Although these universal DXA screening strategies would probably increase the diagnosis rate of undetected male osteoporosis, such strategies may not be cost-effective in all men. Schousboe and colleagues (11) recently reported that universal screening would probably be cost-effective only in men age 80 years or older, although this result was sensitive to the cost of treatment. In addition, DXA is not portable, requires a special technician, and is not readily available in many locales (5, 10–13), and efforts to find a non-DXA test that is suitable for widespread use have not succeeded to date. nnWe conducted a systematic review of the published literature to identify evidence relevant to screening men for osteoporosis. We focused solely on studies concerning the identification of men with risk factors for fracture that may be mediated through low BMD. Recent reviews have summarized the evidence on non-BMD risk factors, including determining who is at increased risk for falls (14) and treatment of persons at elevated risk (15). Our aims were to determine the risk factors for low BMD–mediated osteoporotic fracture in men that could be used to help select patients for BMD testing and whether non-DXA screening tests could be reliably used to diagnose DXA-defined osteoporosis.
机译:背景:通过双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)筛查低骨密度(BMD)是确定可能从骨质疏松症治疗中受益的无症状男性的主要方法。识别处于低BMD和骨折风险中的男性可以帮助临床医生确定应该对哪些男性进行检查。目的:为确定哪些无症状男性应接受DXA BMD测试,该系统评价评估了1)可能由低BMD介导的男性骨质疏松性骨折的危险因素,以及2)非DXA测试在识别低BMD男性中的表现。 nn数据来源:通过MEDLINE数据库确定的研究(1990年至2007年7月)。 nn研究选择:评估男性骨质疏松性骨折危险因素或针对DXA黄金标准进行非DXA筛查测试的文章。 nn数据提取:研究人员对每篇文章进行了独立的双重抽象,确定了筛选测试的性能特征,并评估了所包含文章的质量。 nn数据综合:已发表的对167项评估男女低BMD相关骨折危险因素的研究的荟萃分析发现,高风险因素是年龄增加(> 70岁),体重低(体重指数<20至25) kg / m2),体重减轻(> 10%),缺乏运动,长期使用皮质类固醇和先前发生骨质疏松性骨折。审查了另外102项评估15个其他拟议风险因素的研究;大多数人没有足够的证据得出结论。审查了二十篇诊断研究文章。在T评分阈值为-1.0时,跟骨超声检查对DXA决定的骨质疏松症的敏感性为75%,特异性为66%(DXA T评分为-2.5)。在-1的风险评分阈值下,骨质疏松症自我评估筛查工具的灵敏度为81%,特异性为68%,可用于确定DXA所确定的骨质疏松症。限制:其他筛查测试的数据稀少,包括放射线照相和骨骼几何变量。结论:低BMD介导的骨折的关键危险因素包括年龄增加,体重低,体重减轻,缺乏运动,长期使用皮质类固醇,先前的骨质疏松性骨折和雄激素剥夺疗法。非DXA测试要么太不灵敏,要么数据不足以得出结论。在美国和世界范围内,男性骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗基本不足(1)。 Looker及其同事(2)在评估1997年的第三次全国健康和营养调查数据库时,估计年龄在50岁以上的美国人有30万至200万患有骨质疏松症,而多达1300万的美国人可能骨质疏松。一名60岁的白人有25%的终生骨质疏松性骨折风险(3),骨折的后果可能很严重。髋部骨折后男性的1年死亡率是女性的1倍(1)。尽管男性患骨折的几率很高,但对男性高骨折风险的诊断评估和治疗仍然很少(1,4)。 nn双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)是当前诊断没有骨质疏松性骨折的人的骨质疏松症的金标准测试。但是,这是一项不完善的测试,只能识别不到一半的进展为骨质疏松性骨折的人。例如,在鹿特丹研究(5)中,由DXA确定的骨质疏松症的敏感性分别仅能识别出随后患有非椎骨骨折的老年妇女和男性,分别为44%和21%。显然,除了骨量低之外,其他因素对于确定骨质疏松性骨折风险较高的患者也很重要。跌倒的风险增加可能解释了为什么某些因素被认为是骨质疏松性骨折的独立于骨矿物质密度(BMD)的危险因素(例如三环类抗抑郁药)(6)。尽管不完善,但DXA确定的BMD与男女未来骨质疏松性骨折之间存在牢固且分级的关系(7、8)。鹿特丹研究(7)报告说,腰椎和股骨颈BMD的每SD下降,椎骨和髋部骨折的发生率大约增加一倍。此外,已证明对低DXA测定的BMD的男性进行药物治疗可降低发生后续骨折的风险(9)。 nn一些组织呼吁对具有DXA检测功能的老年男性进行普查(5,10)。尽管这些通用的DXA筛查策略可能会提高未发现的男性骨质疏松症的诊断率,但此类策略可能并非对所有男性都具有成本效益。 Schousboe及其同事(11)最近报道,尽管该结果对治疗费用敏感,但普遍筛查可能仅在80岁以上的男性中才具有成本效益。此外,DXA不是便携式的,需要专门的技术人员,并且在许多区域中也不容易使用(5、10–13),迄今为止,尚未找到适合广泛使用的非DXA测试的努力。 nn我们对已发表的文献进行了系统的综述,以确定与筛查男性骨质疏松症相关的证据。我们仅专注于有关识别可能具有通过低BMD介导的骨折危险因素的男性的研究。最近的评论总结了非BMD危险因素的证据,包括确定跌倒风险增加的人(14)和高风险人士的治疗(15)。我们的目标是确定男性低BMD介导的骨质疏松性骨折的危险因素,可以用来帮助选择要进行BMD测试的患者,以及非DXA筛查测试是否可以可靠地用于诊断DXA定义的骨质疏松症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号