...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination Against Pandemic Influenza (H1N1) 2009
【24h】

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination Against Pandemic Influenza (H1N1) 2009

机译:2009年H1N1大流行性流感疫苗接种的效果和成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decisions on the timing and extent of vaccination against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus are complex. nnObjective: To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pandemic influenza (H1N1) vaccination under different scenarios in October or November 2009. nnDesign: Compartmental epidemic model in conjunction with a Markov model of disease progression. nnData Sources: Literature and expert opinion. nnTarget Population: Residents of a major U.S. metropolitan city with a population of 8.3 million. nnTime Horizon: Lifetime. nnPerspective: Societal. nnInterventions: Vaccination in mid-October or mid-November 2009. nnOutcome Measures: Infections and deaths averted, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness. nnResults of Base-Case Analysis: Assuming each primary infection causes 1.5 secondary infections, vaccinating 40% of the population in October or November would be cost-saving. Vaccination in October would avert 2051 deaths, gain 69 679 QALYs, and save $469 million compared with no vaccination; vaccination in November would avert 1468 deaths, gain 49 422 QALYs, and save $302 million. nnResults of Sensitivity Analysis: Vaccination is even more cost-saving if longer incubation periods, lower rates of infectiousness, or increased implementation of nonpharmaceutical interventions delay time to the peak of the pandemic. Vaccination saves fewer lives and is less cost-effective if the epidemic peaks earlier than mid-October. nnLimitations: The model assumed homogenous mixing of case-patients and contacts; heterogeneous mixing would result in faster initial spread, followed by slower spread. Additional costs and savings not included in the model would make vaccination more cost-saving. nnConclusion: Earlier vaccination against pandemic (H1N1) 2009 prevents more deaths and is more cost-saving. Complete population coverage is not necessary to reduce the viral reproductive rate sufficiently to help shorten the pandemic. nnPrimary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Institute on Drug Abuse
机译:关于2009年H1N1大流行性流感疫苗接种时间和范围的决定很复杂。 nn目的:评估2009年10月或11月在不同情况下大流行性流感(H1N1)疫苗接种的有效性和成本效益。nnDesign:隔间流行病模型与疾病进展的马尔可夫模型结合。 nn数据来源:文献和专家意见。 nn目标人口:美国830万人口的主要大城市的居民。 nnTime Horizo​​n:生命周期。 nnPerspective:社会。 nn干预措施:2009年10月中旬或11月中旬进行疫苗接种。nn结果措施:避免了感染和死亡,成本,质量调整的生命年(QALY)以及成本效益的提高。 nn基本病例分析的结果:假设每个主要感染引起1.5次继发感染,那么在10月或11月为40%的人口接种疫苗将节省成本。与未接种疫苗相比,10月份接种疫苗可避免2051人死亡,获得69,679个QALY,并节省4.69亿美元; 11月份的疫苗接种可避免1468人死亡,获得49 422个QALY,并节省3.02亿美元。 nn敏感性分析的结果:如果更长的潜伏期,较低的传染率或增加的非药物干预措施的实施延迟了大流行高峰的时间,则接种疫苗可进一步节省成本。如果流行病高峰期早于10月中旬,疫苗接种可以挽救更少的生命并降低成本效益。 nn局限性:该模型假定案例患者和联系人的混合均匀;异质混合将导致较快的初始扩散,然后较慢的扩散。该模型中未包含的其他成本和节省将使疫苗接种更加节省成本。 nn结论:较早的2009年H1N1大流行疫苗接种可以防止更多人死亡,并且更节省成本。没有必要完全覆盖人群以充分降低病毒繁殖率以缩短流感大流行的时间。 nn原始资金来源:卫生保健研究与质量局和国家药物滥用研究所

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号