...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Do Methodological Flaws Invalidate a Randomized Trial of Lifestyle Modification Programs in Obese Patients?
【24h】

Do Methodological Flaws Invalidate a Randomized Trial of Lifestyle Modification Programs in Obese Patients?

机译:方法论缺陷是否会使肥胖患者的生活方式改变计划的随机试验无效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article by Digenio and colleagues (1) has several methodological errors. Can we trust the results of a trial in which patients were randomly assigned inappropriately, patient withdrawals substantially shrank the cohort, the “modified” intention-to-treat analysis did not account for the many patients who withdrew, and the analysis was based on distributional and other assumptions that could not possibly be true? This is a bit hard to swallow.
机译:Digenio及其同事(1)的文章存在一些方法错误。我们是否可以相信一项试验的结果,在该试验中,患者的分配不当,患者的退出显着缩小了队列,“修改后的意向治疗”分析未考虑许多退出的患者,并且该分析基于分布和其他可能不可能成立的假设?这有点难以忍受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号