首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation >Medical Care of Employees Long-Term Sick Listed Due to Mental Health Problems: A Cohort Study to Describe and Compare the Care of the Occupational Physician and the General Practitioner
【24h】

Medical Care of Employees Long-Term Sick Listed Due to Mental Health Problems: A Cohort Study to Describe and Compare the Care of the Occupational Physician and the General Practitioner

机译:因心理健康问题而长期病假的员工的医疗护理:一项描述和比较职业医师和全科医生护理的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To describe medical management by the general practitioner (GP) and occupational physician (OP) of workers sick listed due to mental health problems, and to determine agreement in diagnosis, main cause of sickness absence and obstacles in return to work. Methods: A cohort of 555 employees being sick listed for 12 to 20 weeks due to mental health problems was recruited and followed for 1 year. These employees were interviewed about their mental health and contacts with GP, OP, other specialists and employer. In addition, the GP and/or the OP of 72 employees were interviewed about the medical diagnosis and management. Results: Most employees sick listed for 12–20 weeks visited their GP and OP. According to the employees most interventions applied by the GP were medical interventions, such as referral of employees and prescription of medical drugs. Working conditions were seldom discussed by the GP and work-related interventions were never applied. Most interventions applied by the OP were work-related interventions and/or contact with the employer. The OP more often talked about working conditions and conflicts. According to the employees, the communication between GP and OP only took place in 8% of the cases. Agreement in the diagnosis, main cause of sickness absence, and obstacles in return to work reported by the GPs and OPs of the same employee was poor. In addition, similarity in reported diagnosis by GP and/or OP and the employees’ scores on valid questionnaires on (mental) health was limited. Conclusions: The lack of communication and agreement by Dutch GPs and OPs in medical diagnosis and management of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems are indicators of sub—optimal medical treatment and return-to-work strategies.
机译:目的:描述因精神健康问题而被列出的患病工人的全科医生(GP)和职业医师(OP)的医疗管理,并确定诊断的共识,疾病的主要病因和重返工作的障碍。方法:招募了555名因精神健康问题而在12至20周内患病的员工,并随访1年。对这些员工进行了心理健康方面的访谈,并采访了他们与GP,OP,其他专家和雇主的联系。此外,对72名员工的GP和/或OP进行了有关医疗诊断和管理的访谈。结果:大多数在12到20周内有病的员工去看了他们的GP和OP。根据员工的说法,GP所采用的大多数干预措施都是医疗干预措施,例如员工推荐和处方药。 GP很少讨论工作条件,并且从未采用与工作相关的干预措施。 OP所采用的大多数干预措施都是与工作有关的干预措施和/或与雇主的联系。 OP经常谈论工作条件和冲突。根据员工的说法,GP和OP之间的沟通仅发生在8%的案例中。同一位员工的全科医生和普通医生报告的诊断,疾病缺席的主要原因以及重返工作的障碍方面的协议很差。此外,由GP和/或OP报告的诊断与员工在(心理)健康方面有效问卷上的得分之间的相似性受到限制。结论:由于精神健康问题,荷兰GP和OP在医务人员对长期病患者的医疗诊断和管理方面缺乏沟通和共识,这是次优治疗和重返工作策略的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号