首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Methods for Motion Correction Evaluation Using 18F-FDG Human Brain Scans on a High-Resolution PET Scanner
【24h】

Methods for Motion Correction Evaluation Using 18F-FDG Human Brain Scans on a High-Resolution PET Scanner

机译:在高分辨率PET扫描仪上使用18F-FDG人脑扫描进行运动校正评估的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many authors have reported the importance of motion correction (MC) for PET. Patient motion during scanning disturbs kinetic analysis and degrades resolution. In addition, using misaligned transmission for attenuation and scatter correction may produce regional quantification bias in the reconstructed emission images. The purpose of this work was the development of quality control (QC) methods for MC procedures based on external motion tracking (EMT) for human scanning using an optical motion tracking system. Methods: Two scans with minor motion and 5 with major motion (as reported by the optical motion tracking system) were selected from ^sup 18^F-FDG scans acquired on a PET scanner. The motion was measured as the maximum displacement of the markers attached to the subject's head and was considered to be major if larger than 4 mm and minor if less than 2 mm. After allowing a 40- to 60-min uptake time after tracer injection, we acquired a 6-min transmission scan, followed by a 40-min emission list-mode scan. Each emission list-mode dataset was divided into 8 frames of 5 min. The reconstructed time-framed images were aligned to a selected reference frame using either EMT or the AIR (automated image registration) software. The following 3 QC methods were used to evaluate the EMT and AIR MC: a method using the ratio between 2 regions of interest with gray matter voxels (GM) and white matter voxels (WM), called GM/WM; mutual information; and cross correlation. Results: The results of the 3 QC methods were in agreement with one another and with a visual subjective inspection of the image data. Before MC, the QC method measures varied significantly in scans with major motion and displayed limited variations on scans with minor motion. The variation was significantly reduced and measures improved after MC with AIR, whereas EMT MC performed less well. Conclusion: The 3 presented QC methods produced similar results and are useful for evaluating tracer-independent external-tracking motion-correction methods for human brain scans. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Show less
机译:许多作者报告了运动校正(MC)对于PET的重要性。扫描期间患者的运动会干扰动力学分析并降低分辨率。另外,使用未对准的传输进行衰减和散射校正可能会在重建的发射图像中产生区域量化偏差。这项工作的目的是开发基于MC的质量控制(QC)方法,该方法基于使用光学运动跟踪系统进行人体扫描的外部运动跟踪(EMT)。方法:从PET扫描仪上获取的18张F-FDG扫描中,选择两次轻微运动扫描和5次主要运动扫描(由光学运动跟踪系统报告)。该运动被测量为附着在受试者头部的标记的最大位移,如果大于4 mm,则认为是主要运动,如果小于2 mm,则认为是次要运动。示踪剂注入后允许40至60分钟的吸收时间后,我们进行了6分钟的透射扫描,然后进行了40分钟的发射列表模式扫描。每个排放清单模式数据集分为5分钟的8帧。使用EMT或AIR(自动图像配准)软件将重建的时间框架图像与选定的参考帧对齐。以下3种QC方法用于评估EMT和AIR MC:一种使用2个感兴趣区域与灰质体素(GM)和白质体素(WM)的比率的方法,称为GM / WM;相互信息;和互相关。结果:3种质量控制方法的结果彼此一致,并且对图像数据进行了视觉主观检查。在MC之前,QC方法测量的是大运动扫描的显着变化,而小运动扫描的显示变化有限。使用AIR进行MC后,差异显着降低,并且改善了措施,而EMT MC的效果较差。结论:提出的3种QC方法产生了相似的结果,可用于评估独立于示踪剂的人脑扫描外部跟踪运动校正方法。 [出版物摘要]显示较少

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号