首页> 外文期刊>Journal of network and computer applications >Pleasure or pain? An evaluation of the costs and utilities of bloatware applications in android smartphones
【24h】

Pleasure or pain? An evaluation of the costs and utilities of bloatware applications in android smartphones

机译:快乐还是痛苦?在Android智能手机中评估Bloatware应用程序的成本和实用程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigate the privacy, security, and trust issues of the Android bloatware applications and evaluate the claims regarding their utility and the coverage of the functional needs of different end-user market segments. We analyze 17,179 bloatware applications, extracted from the firmware of 100 Android smartphones manufactured by nine leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and conduct an online user study to validate the utility and coverage claims. We find an average of 172 bloatware applications in the firmware of examined smartphones. We discover that most of the bloatware applications can access sensitive data and critical device features in smartphones and perform critical functions. Their nature and abilities due to the use of Dangerous, Custom, and Signature Android Permissions can make privacy protection a complex task for the smartphone users, introduce trust issues, and expand the attack surface in the smartphones. We also provide a non-exhaustive set of examples of bloatware applications from smartphones of all nine brands that violate trust. Coming to their utilities, findings of our online user study involving 180 participants suggest that while most of the respondents agree that bloatware applications are useful to some extent, 39% of the respondents use 0-5 bloatware applications. An additional 35% of respondents use 6-10 bloatware applications. We also find that for their diverse functional needs, users depend more on applications acquired from different application markets. The results of our research suggest that while the pains of the bloatware applications are real, the claims regarding their pleasures need further investigation. We urge that the number and abilities of smartphone bloatware applications need to be constrained proportionally to their practical utilities for their users, and they must conform to security and privacy requirements for trustworthy systems.
机译:我们调查Android Bloatware应用程序的隐私,安全性和信任问题,并评估有关其实用程序的索赔以及不同最终用户市场段的功能需求的覆盖范围。我们分析了17,179个Bloatware应用程序,从九个领先的原始设备制造商(OEM)制造的100个Android智能手机的固件中提取,并进行在线用户学习,以验证公用事业和覆盖索赔。我们在审查的智能手机的固件中找到了一个平均的172个Bloatware应用程序。我们发现大多数Bloatware应用程序可以访问智能手机中的敏感数据和关键设备功能,并执行关键功能。他们的性质和能力由于使用危险,自定义和签名Android权限,可以为智能手机用户提供一个复杂的任务,引入信任问题,并在智能手机中扩展攻击面。我们还提供来自所有违反信任的所有九个品牌的智能手机的爆破软件应用程序的非详尽示例。来到他们的公用事业,我们的在线用户学习的调查结果涉及180名参与者,虽然大多数受访者认为Bloatware应用程序在某种程度上有用,但39%的受访者使用0-5个Bloatware应用程序。另外35%的受访者使用6-10个陷阱软件应用程序。我们还发现,为了它们多样化的功能需求,用户更多地依赖于不同应用市场获取的应用程序。我们的研究结果表明,虽然Bloatware应用程序的痛苦是真实的,但对他们的快乐的索赔需要进一步调查。我们敦促智能手机展示软件应用程序的数量和能力需要按比例地限制为他们的用户的实用实用程序,并且他们必须符合值得信赖的系统的安全和隐私要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号