首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs >American Policy toward the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Implications for its Resolution
【24h】

American Policy toward the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Implications for its Resolution

机译:美国对纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫冲突的政策及其解决的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as one of the most destructive regional conflicts, has became a problem not just for the conflicting sides but also for other regional and even non-regional actors as well, such as the United States (US) which experiences difficulty in dealing with the conflict. The US policy toward the conflict was constrained by its domestic politics and lobbies, which act on their narrow interests, compared with the global role and interests of the US. On the one hand US interests require the protection of Azerbaijan's territorial integrity and stability, since it has substantial energy resources. On the other hand, domestic constraints prevented the US administration from playing the honest broker in conflict resolution, at least for Azerbaijan. The realization of projects advancing the transportation of Caspian energy resources to the world markets was delayed and despite the ceasefire agreement in 1994, the problem continues. This paper analyses US policy towards the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and focus on the US role during the peace process. The analysis points to the need for the US to pay attention to the early settlement of the conflict without which the normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations, which remains one of the major aims of the US regional policy, will also not be possible.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.694667
机译:纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫冲突是最具破坏性的区域冲突之一,不仅成为冲突双方的问题,也成为其他区域乃至非区域行为者的问题,例如在处理冲突。与美国的全球角色和利益相比,美国对冲突的政策受到其国内政治和游说机构的制约,这些游说机构仅出于狭narrow的利益而行动。一方面,美国的利益要求保护阿塞拜疆的领土完整和稳定,因为它拥有大量的能源。另一方面,由于国内的限制,至少在阿塞拜疆而言,美国政府无法在冲突解决中扮演诚实的经纪人的角色。促进里海能源向世界市场运输的项目的实现被推迟,尽管1994年达成了停火协议,问题仍在继续。本文分析了美国对纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫冲突的政策,并着眼于美国在和平进程中的作用。分析指出,美国有必要注意及早解决冲突,否则,将仍然无法实现仍然是美国区域政策的主要目标之一的土耳其-亚美尼亚关系正常化。全文下载相关文章,请参见var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.694667

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号