...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Does history repeat itself? Business cycle and industry returns
【24h】

Does history repeat itself? Business cycle and industry returns

机译:历史是否重复?商业周期和行业回报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

y Industries with higher historical business cycle regime Sharpe ratios (RSR) have higher regime-dependent expected returns. Conditional on whether output gap is positive or negative, an out-of-sample long-high-RSR and short-low-RSR sector rotation strategy generates 14.02% annualized alpha in Fama-French five-factor model during 1985-2014. Industry momentum and related anomalies are unlikely to be the source of alpha. Firms in long portfolios have stronger fundamentals, more upward analyst forecast revisions, and more positive forecast errors. Our results suggest that investors don't fully incorporate business cycle variation in cash flow growth and highlight the importance of business cycle on the cross-section of industry returns. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:历史悠久的商业周期政权锐利比率(RSR)具有更高的政权依赖预期回报。有条件的输出差距是正面还是否定,一个样本的长高RSR和短路rsr扇区旋转策略在1985 - 2014年期间在Fama-French五因素模型中产生14.02%的年化alpha。行业动量和相关异常不太可能成为alpha的来源。在长组合中的公司具有更强的基本面,更加向上的分析师预测修订,以及更积极的预测错误。我们的研究结果表明,投资者并未完全纳入现金流量的业务周期变化,并突出商业周期对行业回报横截面的重要性。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号