首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Screening >Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods
【24h】

Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods

机译:长期不参与筛查的女性提高宫颈癌筛查的摄取:增强邀请方法的随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three methods of inviting women with a long history of non-attendance to undergo cervical screening. nnMethods: Randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. In all, 1140 women were identified from routine NHS screening records as having no smear for at least 15 years and randomly allocated to receive a telephone call from a nurse, a letter from a well-known celebrity (Claire Rayner) or letter from the local NHS Cervical Screening Commissioner. Uptake of screening was measured using routine data and attributed to interventions if occurring within three months. Uptake was compared with a control group. Costs of carrying out the interventions were noted from the perspective of the NHS and cost-effectiveness, as cost per additional attender, calculated. nnResults: Uptake following all interventions was low: telephone call (1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–3.6%); celebrity letter (1.8, 95% CI 0.57–4.0%); commissioner letter (4.6, 95% CI 2.5–7.7%); control group (1.8, 95% CI 0.57–4.0%). There were no significant differences between groups. Telephone intervention was not possible in a quarter of women whose numbers were unlisted. Telephone intervention was the most expensive and least effective of the interventions. The commissioner letter yielded an additional attender within three months at an incremental cost of £23.21 compared with taking no action. nnConclusions: Neither a telephone call from a nurse nor a letter from a celebrity to encourage attendance for cervical screening were effective or cost-effective in women with a prolonged history of non-participation in the screening programme. A letter from the local cervical screening programme commissioner resulted in a small, non-significant increase in uptake. The low cost and ease of implementation of this intervention supports further research into its use in routine practice.
机译:目的:比较三种邀请长期无护理史的妇女进行宫颈筛查的方法的有效性和成本效益。 nn方法:随机对照试验和成本效益分析。根据常规的NHS筛查记录,总共有1140名妇女至少有15年没有涂片检查,并被随机分配来接听护士的电话,知名人士的来信(Claire Rayner)或当地人的来信。 NHS子宫颈检查专员。使用常规数据测量筛查的摄取,如果在三个月内发生,则归因于干预措施。将摄取与对照组进行比较。从NHS和成本效益的角度记录了实施干预措施的成本,并计算了每增加一名与会者的成本。结果:所有干预措施的吸收率都很低:电话(1.4,95%置信区间[CI] 0.38–3.6%);名人信(1.8,95%CI 0.57–4.0%);专员函(4.6,95%CI 2.5–7.7%);对照组(1.8,95%CI 0.57–4.0%)。两组之间无显着差异。有四分之一的人数不详的妇女无法进行电话干预。电话干预是最昂贵,效果最差的干预措施。与不采取任何行动相比,专员函在三个月内产生了额外的与会人员,增加的费用为23.21英镑。结论:对于长期不参与筛查计划的女性,无论是护士打来的电话还是鼓励名人参加宫颈筛查的名人来信都没有效果。当地子宫颈普查计划专员的来信导致摄入量有小幅但不显着的增加。这种干预措施的低成本和易于实施,为进一步研究其在常规实践中的使用提供了支持。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Medical Screening》 |2005年第4期|p.185-189|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Noy Scott House, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK;

    Public Health Development Unit, Catherine Street, Plymouth PL1 2AD, UK;

    Mid Devon Primary Care Trust, Newcourt House, Old Rydon Lane, Exeter EX2 7JY, UK;

    Devon Patient and Practitioner Services Agency, Dean Clarke House, Southernhay East, Exeter EX1 1PQ, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号