...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of material cycles and waste management >Life cycle environmental performance of two restaurant food waste management strategies at Shenzhen, China
【24h】

Life cycle environmental performance of two restaurant food waste management strategies at Shenzhen, China

机译:中国深圳两家餐馆食品废物管理策略的生命周期环境性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Restaurant food waste (RFW) can be separated from other municipal solid waste (MSW) for individual treatment or treatedtogether with other MSW, and it is disputed which option is the optimal strategy for MSW management in the practice ofShenzhen, China. To weigh pros and cons of RFW separation, a hybrid life cycle assessment is conducted to compare (S1) allMSW incineration and (S2) individual anaerobic digestion of RFW and other MSW incineration referring to the real situation.The results show that S2 reduces 10.6% carbon emission than S1, mainly owing to higher heat value of incineration feedstockand higher yield of electricity. In addition, the cumulative energy demands of S1 and S2 are − 6290 and − 6544 MJ/t MSW,and their energy efficiencies are 67.4 and 70.3%, respectively. Moreover, RFW separation reduces acidic gases emission dueto the substitution effect of more energy products. Overall, source sorting of RFW is a sustainable model of MSW managementat Shenzhen, and the result provides quantitative support for the strategy of RFW separation from MSW.
机译:餐厅食品垃圾(RFW)可以与其他市政固体废物(MSW)分开,用于个体治疗或治疗与其他MSW一起,它是有争议的,哪种选项是MSW管理在实践中的最佳策略深圳,中国。为了权衡RFW分离的利弊,进行混合生命周期评估以比较(S1)所有MSW焚烧和(S2)单独的厌氧消化RFW和其他MSW焚烧指的是真实情况。结果表明,S2比S1减少了10.6%的碳发射,主要是由于焚烧原料的热量较高和更高的电力。此外,S1和S2的累积能源需求为-6290和-6544 MJ / T MSW,它们的能量效率分别为67.4和70.3%。此外,RFW分离减少了由于酸性气体排放替代更多能源产品的替代效果。总体而言,RFW的源分类是MSW管理的可持续模式在深圳,结果为来自MSW的RFW分离策略提供了定量支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号