...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management studies >Agency Theory Institutional Sensitivity and Inductive Reasoning: Towards a Legal Perspective
【24h】

Agency Theory Institutional Sensitivity and Inductive Reasoning: Towards a Legal Perspective

机译:代理理论的制度敏感性和归纳推理:一个法律的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Making agency theory institutionally sensitive is a reasonable suggestion, as far as normal science stands. However, we argue that such a move has already been taking place, that it cannot address important problems with agency theory, and that the time is ripe for a critical re-examination of this theory. We suggest that inductive studies can not only be more sensitive to institutional features than deductive studies, but they can also offer deeper understanding of governance practices in specific contexts, as well as the potential for analytical or moderatum generalizations. Drawing from legal theory, we offer an alternative conception of the principal, and of the role and status of the board of directors. We contend that this reformulated agency theory has a greater potential of being institutionally sensitive because it recognizes various stakeholders as team members, rather than just adding specific institutional features as variables to the dominant conception of agency theory.
机译:就普通科学而言,使代理理论在制度上敏感是一个合理的建议。但是,我们认为这种举动已经在发生,它不能解决代理理论的重要问题,并且对该技术进行批判性重新审查的时机已经成熟。我们建议,归纳研究不仅比演绎研究对制度特征更为敏感,而且还可以提供对特定情况下治理实践的更深刻理解,以及进行分析或适度概括的潜力。从法律理论出发,我们提供了关于委托人,董事会的角色和地位的另一种概念。我们认为,这种重新制定的代理理论在制度上具有更大的潜力,因为它认可各种利益相关者为团队成员,而不仅仅是将特定的制度特征作为变量添加到主导的代理理论中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号