首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Trade Associations Matter as Units of Selection, as Actors Within Comparative and Historical Institutional Frameworks, and as Potential Impediments to Societal Wide Collective Action
【24h】

Trade Associations Matter as Units of Selection, as Actors Within Comparative and Historical Institutional Frameworks, and as Potential Impediments to Societal Wide Collective Action

机译:行业协会是选择的单位,是比较和历史制度框架内的参与者,也是全社会集体行动的潜在障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The papers in this special section highlight three important questions in organization and management theory. First, evolutionary theorists studying organizations have an opportunity to address issues of organizations as units of selection. Trade associations focus their members' attention on collective interests, creating shared understandings about issues and a collective identity that unifies an association and justifies calls for action by the association on the members' behalf. Second, for scholars using historical and comparative frameworks, the study of trade associations presents an opportunity to study similar kinds of organizations in very different institutional settings. Many things that trade associations do are driven not because they are business interest associations but because they have to follow many of the same paths as other interest associations in the same institutional environment. Across nations, political systems differ substantially in the way interests can be pursued, with important contingencies including the difference between pluralist versus corporatist systems, the extent to which political institutions depend upon the information provided by interest groups, and the extent to which political institutions are actually open to lobbying. Third, trade associations represent powerful actors with the potential to undermine the pursuit of collective action for achieving public goods. For example, in the United States, to the extent that the decline of elite class cohesion and moderate business peak associations has weakened the forces of conciliation and compromise, strong trade associations may step into the void and make matters worse.
机译:本节的论文重点介绍了组织和管理理论中的三个重要问题。首先,研究组织的进化理论家有机会解决作为选择单位的组织问题。行业协会将其成员的注意力集中在集体利益上,建立对问题和集体身份的共同理解,从而统一一个协会并为该协会代表会员国采取行动辩护。其次,对于使用历史和比较框架的学者而言,行业协会的研究提供了一个机会,可以在非常不同的机构环境中研究类似类型的组织。行业协会所做的许多事情之所以被推动,并不是因为它们是商业利益协会,而是因为它们必须在相同的机构环境中遵循与其他利益协会相同的许多路径。在各个国家中,政治制度在追求利益的方式上有很大的不同,重要的意外事件包括多元主义与社团主义制度之间的差异,政治制度在多大程度上取决于利益集团提供的信息以及政治制度在多大程度上取决于利益集团。实际上是向游说者开放的。第三,行业协会代表着强大的行动者,有可能破坏为实现公共物品而采取的集体行动。例如,在美国,在某种程度上,精英阶层凝聚力的下降和适度的商业高峰协会削弱了调解和妥协的力量,强大的贸易协会可能会陷入空白,并使情况变得更糟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号